June 13, 2016 Editorial: Another Reason Emory University Should Fire James Curran
HHV-6 University Editorial
Another Reason James Curran Should be Asked to Resign from Emory University
When historians attempt to deconstruct the sociopathic science that has given us the cover-up of a major HIV/AIDS Ponzi scheme and a massive epidemic of diseases related to HHV-6 (like AIDS, Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, etc.), they should look closely at a shocking moment back in the 80s when the CDC's James Curran (now a Dean at Emory University) altered AIDS research data.
In Science Fictions, John Crewdson's meticulous documentation of the frauds of Robert Gallo, the scientist who makes Bernie Madoff look like Mother Teresa, that moment is described. Under political pressure to name something the cause of AIDS, James Curran, then a kind of de facto AIDS Czar, basically did something scientists often do when their data doesn't perfectly fit their hypothesis: he altered it.
Gallo, as everyone now knows, stole the so-called exogenous retrovirus that the French scientists at the Pasteur Institute supposedly found in AIDS patients. Gallo and his toadies then created their own fraudulent test from their stolen French retrovirus and then, in Three-Card-Monte fashion, they had an Americanized test for an Americanized retrovirus. When the Centers for Disease Control compared the French and Gallo tests for accuracy, according to Crewdson, the Pasteur Institute's test was slightly better. According to Crewdson, in typical Gallo style, he wanted the CDC to alter the results so as to reflect a better score for Gallo's version of the test. It was just another day in the sociopathic science of AIDS, so of course James Curran agreed to Gallo's outrageous request.
This is just another reason Emory University immediately should ask for the resignation of James Curran, a scientific crook who should not be the Dean of the Rollins School of Public Health. Unless of course the whole purpose of universities is to turn out sociopathic scientists who can compete against other sociopathic scientists in the brave new world of sociopathic science that AIDS and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome research have created.
Previous HHV-6 University Editorials
June 10, 2016 HHV-6 University Editorial
It's time for the students and faculty at Emory University to dump James Curran, one of the people who helped craft the homophobic, racist and sociopathic science of AIDS and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome. Why is he the Dean of the Rollins School of Public Health?
June 9, 2016 HHV-6 University Editorial
It's time to reconsider the Jane Teas African Swine Fever Virus AIDS Hypothesis
Now that African Swine Fever is back in the news in the context of an AIDS epidemic in bees that is causing colony collapse disorder, it's time to reconsider the hypothesis of Jane Teas that African Swine Fever is the real cause of AIDS. What is the relationship of African Swine Fever to HHV-6 and HHV-8? Is African Swine Fever really the trigger for both AIDS and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome? Are American pigs now infected with some new strains of African Swine Fever Virus? There are a number of articles on Jane Teas and her colleague John Beldekas available on the internet. Here is one at Spin Magazine. And here is an AP story that appeared in The New York Times.
June 4, 2016 HHV-6 University Editorial
Before Ron Davis, Ian Lipkin and Maureen Hanson start doing new rounds of CFS hocus-pocus in their laboratories, we suggest they test what could be called the Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Metahypothesis.
The Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Metahypothesis:
For over three decades, the Centers for Disease Control has been covering up the relationship between so-called AIDS and so-called Chronic Fatigue Syndrome by a massive deception and self-deception involving nosology, epidemiology, HIV and HHV/6/7/8 fraud.
Capiche?
(Please read and reread this metahypothesis very, very carefully and make sure you thoroughly understand it before any research commences. Ponder its implications before you even start to form your own hypotheses.)
Good luck testing the Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Metahypothesis! If you ignore it may the best CFS hocus-pocus win!
June 1, 2016 HHV-6 Editorial
Ron Davis, CFS Reinvent-the-Wheelism and CFS Virgin Birtherism
Geneticist Ron Davis, who has a son suffering terribly with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, is getting involved with CFS research. According to the End ME.CFS Project, "Under the guidance of world-renowned geneticist Ronald W. Davis, PhD., we have brought in top experts in a variety of fields for a bold and new collaborative research project. Our ultimate goal is unlocking the mystery of myalgic encephalomyelitis / chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) and end the suffering caused by the disease. The project’s first study is the ME/CFS Severely Ill-Big DATA Study that is designed to find a clinically useful diagnostic biomarker."
Cool, right? Open the champagne, right? World-renowned? Whoopty do!
Not so fast.
We fear all this smells of "CFS Reinventing-the-Wheelism" and "CFS Virgin Birtherism."
Anyone who comes to CFS and starts throwing around the word "mystery" has a serious ethical problem. Scientists are not supposed to ignore previous work on something they are researching. When they do that in the realm of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, you pretty much know you are in the presence of "CFS Reinventing-the-Wheelism." You also know you are in the presence of the kind of naive folks who think that science is not political and government scientists never lie about anything. Poor things. Sad.
There are hundreds of studies about Chronic Fatigue Syndrome that make this illness very unmysterious. Painfully so.
Read the work of Hillary Johnson and Neenyah Ostrom and ten years of reporting on Chronic Fatigue Syndrome in New York Native.
To call it mysterious is to promote a very Big Lie.
All of the science that has been published on Chronic Fatigue Syndrome is bullshit? Says who? A renowned geneticist? One who wears his underpants on the outside of his pants and a cape?
What is mysterious is the cockamamie act of CFS scientists ignoring what has preceded them.What is mysterious is CFS scientists ignoring all the damage HHV-6 is doing to the bodies of CFS patients.
Over the years a number of scientific narcissists (Hello Ian Lipkin!) have entered the field who have basically implied that nobody should worry because now a real rootin'-tootin' scientist has arrived. These narcissists generally are anti-history and anti-intellectual and have have not bothered to do their homework, But then scientists are not paid to read deeply or widely, think or seriously challenge authority. (Read Betrayers of the Truth if you have any doubt about that).
Does Ron Davis have a clue about the sociopathic science that forms the foundation of the CFS and AIDS cover-up? We doubt it. We suspect that his illustrious colleagues are probably clueless, too. A new variation of an old-boy network is not the antidote to an ongoing era of sociopathic science.
One of the nonmysteries about CFS is that it is transmissible. Families come down with it. Orchestras, classes, people who have slept with the same woman who was suffering from CFS. (Go to the index in Johnson's Osler's Web and check out "transmission" in the index.)
To not talk about transmission is to go down the road of "CFS Virgin Birtherism," a belief that somehow, out of nowhere, one suddenly comes down with CFS, a disease that should be called AIDS Lite or AIDS Spectrum Disease, but never is by the politically correct CFS crowd that is trying to control the activist narrative. (They would rather die than talk about the intertwined relationship of CFS and AIDS. Unfortunately, many have.)
To talk about Chronic Fatigue Syndrome and AIDS in the same breath results in the kind of exile that Judy Mikovits has experienced. First Mikovits was screwed by the scientific establishment for basically finding AIDS-like retroviral activity in CFS and now she is being screwed by the CFS community for referring to CFS as "Non-HIV AIDS." In a world of sociopathic science she just can win for losing.
The big questions directed at Ron Davis should be "Does your son possibly have a virus or some other agent that he is capable of spreading to you and the rest of your family? Are you already infected and showing the effects of that agent in different ways? Can people who come in close contact with your son develop the disease? Can they then infect other people? Has that agent been spreading for over three decades and are millions of people now on the CFS Spectrum or more appropriately, the AIDS Spectrum? Is your son just one of many millions of infected people who are victims of a pandemic that has been ignored at best and covered up at worst? Are scientists emphasizing genetics actually aiding and abetting a public health cover-up of a contagious illness capable of destroying the immune system?"
If Davis thinks that such questions don't really matter and we just need a genetics genius like him and a team of big names (all male) to ride in on white horses and reinvent the CFS wheel, then we suggest that he could be of more use running around the world with his underpants on the outside of his clothes (he is pictured below). Nothing gets the world's attention more than a world-renowned geneticist wearing his underwear outside of his pants. If his science is as good as his public relations strategies, all CFS patients should make sure their wills are in order.
A renowned geneticist who will save the world.
May 25, 2016 HHV-6 Editorial
The Millions Missing campaign utilizing shoes is perhaps the most effective effort we have yet seen on behalf of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome. Congratulations to everyone behind it. You're hitting it out of the park.
We have a suggestion.
Everyone involved should now send one of their shoes to Francis Collins at the National Institutes of Health (9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, Maryland 20892). The other shoe should be sent to Anthony Fauci at the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (3012 43rd St NW, Washington, DC 20016).
We have little doubt that every major media outlet in the country would eventually cover this story.
May 24, HHV-6 Editorial
How Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Threatens to Expose AIDS Czar Fauci and the CDC's Perfect Scientific Crime
Chronic Fatigue Syndrome sufferers are constantly puzzled by the remorselessly contemptuous manner in which they are treated by AIDS Czar Anthony Fauci and government scientists at the CDC. Hillary Johnson did a wonderful job of capturing that contempt in her masterpiece Osler's Web.
The treatment has been uncanny and never seems to really change. The patients cry, "Why, why, why, why?" To many it makes no sense. Many of the sufferers are white middle class heterosexuals are used to being treated with a modicum of respect from their government and its bureaucrats. They feel a certain amount of white heterosexual privilege and just can't fathom why they are being so ruthlessly disrespected and "disappeared."
The patients don't realize that they are being gaslighted by a grotesque empire of sociopathic science. The patients are treated like they are whiny nuts. When they complain they are almost driven crazy by sadistically being told that they are crazy.
It's a shame that CFS community doesn't understand what is going on. Patients operate from a basis of naive good faith, totally unaware that they are petitioning a system full of all the bad faith and consciencelessness that is characteristic of sociopaths and sociopathic science.
Chronic Fatigue Syndrome patients do not understand that they are potentially ruining and exposing a perfect sociopathic scientific crime. Sociopaths hate when they are recognized for what they are and the sociopaths who are in charge of AIDS are no different from classic sociopaths.
Wikipedia defines a perfect crime: "Perfect crime is a colloquial term used in law and fiction (especially crime fiction) to characterize crimes that are undetected, unattributed to a perpetrator, or else unsolved as a kind of technical achievement on the part of the perpetrator. In certain contexts, the concept of perfect crime is limited to just undetected crimes; if an event is ever identified as a crime, some investigators say it cannot be called 'perfect.'"
By not recognizing exactly what Fauci and the CDC are doing, CFS patients help keep a perfect crime "perfect."
Serious research into Chronic Fatigue Syndrome from day one has always pointed to a relationship between Chronic Fatigue Syndrome and AIDS. Anyone who disputes that is either seriously uninformed or lying to themselves. Newbies should start their research with the 1990 paper by Nancy Klimas in which she describes as "a form of acquired immunodeficiency." Hello!
Chronic Fatigue Syndrome ruins the perfect crime of systemic AIDS fraud.
Chronic Fatigue Syndrome threatens to expose the perfect crime of AIDS epidemiological fraud.
Chronic Fatigue Syndrome threatens to show that AIDS Czar Anthony Fauci has been in charge of one of the most perfect scientific crimes in the history of mankind.
Chronic Fatigue Syndrome threatens to expose the massive retroviral fraud that has been used to cover up what HHV-6 is and what it does. (This goes for HHV-7 and HHV-8 too.)
When Elaine DeFrieitas detected some retroviral activity in CFS and tried valiantly to sort it out, she came too close to exposing the fraud of HIV and the cover-up of HHV-6 and HERV-K18. She had to be derailed.
The same thing happened to Judy Mikovits when she detected retroviral activity in CFS and got too close to exposing the perfect scientific crime of HIV fraud and the cover-up of HHV-6 and HERV-K18. Mikovits now sadly and pathetically travels around the country doing talk shows and giving interviews in which she describes CFS as "Non-HIV AIDS." CFS patients don't like to talk about her as much as they once did because "Non-HIV AIDS" is just a little too much truth for their tastes. And the AIDS establishment must also be terrified of that expression because it is yet another threat to the perfect scientific crimes that AIDS pseudoscience and pseudo-epidmiology are.
Chronic Fatigue Syndrome patients who treat AIDS as a separate epidemic have basically become accessories to AIDS Czar Fauci and the CDC's perfect scientific crime. The inconvenient truth is that they have become Fauci's useful idiots and his enablers.
Until CFS patients can accept the relationship between CFS and AIDS, the sociopathic science of Fauci and the CDC will continue to roll over them with impunity.
May 21, 2016 HHV-6 University Editorial
Is Ian Lipkin Some Kind of Idiot?
“ME/CFS is a global problem that we need to address – it robs people
of the most productive years of their lives, it causes immunological
dysfunction, profound fatigue, cognitive dysfunction. It really
destroys peoples’ lives. It is underappreciated, it is underfunded,
and with your support we hope to find solutions to this crippling
problem”. ~Dr. Ian Lipkin
If Ian Lipkin doesn't see Chronic Fatigue Syndrome as part of the AIDS epidemic and if he doesn't examine the role of HHV-6 in CFS as well as the endogenous superantigen retrovirus HERV-K18 it transactivates, then he is just playing games with people's lives and money. At best he is an enabler of the socipathic science that has characterized CFS/AIDS research for over three decades. At worst he is just another CFS/AIDS charlatan and rip-off artist.
Lipkin needs the members of the CFS community to play his patsies. Don't oblige him.
May 16, 2016 HHV-6 University Editorial
Dating while Disabled (Uhhhh, with a Contagious Disease)????
Litsa Dremousis has written a an op-ed piece in The Washington Post that raises questions she seems to not even be aware of. The title of the piece, "Dating while disabled: From Day One with someone new, I feel vulnerable" immediately caught our attention.
Ms. Dremousis writes about breaking up with an man who had been her fiance "until two weeks ago." She notes, "when you’re disabled, you feel indebted every day, making dating that much harder than it is for the average person." As we read that sentence we thought, well, yes, especially since you have a contagious illness, Ms. Dremousis. She outlines some of the challenges: "And no matter how fiercely autonomous and intelligent you are, you’re starting each relationship as the one who needs help doing otherwise simple tasks, such as walking downstairs or driving. Even with healthy self-esteem, it’s hard not to feel intensively vulnerable."
We of course wondered about the challenges of the uninfected person without CFS who might end up dating her, someone who might be exposed to a contagious illness that seems to effect every system in the body. Oh, but that's their problem.
Ms. Desmousis is not slacker when it comes to describing CFS. She's not from the "too tired to get out of bed school" of CFS self-description. She writes, " . . . struggling with chronic fatigue syndrome makes me often feel as if I have a powerful flu. I deal with constant temperature fluctuations; extreme sensitivity to light and sound; dangerously low blood pressure; and fatigue so powerful it feels like a Buick is sitting on my chest." And she adds, "I’m unable to stay upright more than a few hours on a good day; for the past several years, I have needed to be wheeled through airports (if you think air travel is a nightmare, try doing it in a wheelchair). And when I’m on a plane or bus, I have to wear a surgical mask because my immune system is so compromised. Twice in recent years, someone else’s cold became my pneumonia."
She writes, "For 24 years I’ve had ME/CFS (formerly known as “chronic fatigue syndrome”), a disabling neuro-immune illness similar in many ways to multiple sclerosis" Imagine if she had written, "For 24 years I’ve had ME/CFS (formerly known as “chronic fatigue syndrome”), a contagious disabling neuro-immune illness similar in many ways to multiple sclerosis and AIDS. "If she had she would have been exiled from the CFS community and The Washington Post would probably not have published the piece in the first place.
But the real bombshell in the piece was what she wrote about Trent, her fiance: "Five days after Trent asked me to marry him, a routine check-up unearthed a brain tumor behind his left ear. A longtime professor, Trent is deeply intelligent and tenacious. We were in love and determined to remain upbeat about his prospects. I took care of him over six months, as we assembled his surgical team, spent a week in the hospital as he underwent and recovered from the successful but complicated brain surgery, and then as he went through months of physical therapy. I was his main source of emotional support, but it took a huge toll on my health."
While we sympathize with Ms Dremousis and Trent, what really turned our head was the possibility that the two of them might have shared something more than their love, namely a virus called . . . drum roll . . . HHV-6. For any newbies visiting HHV-6 University, we have done numerous items on the relationship between HHV-6 and cancer. HHV-6 is very oncogenic. Did we say very?
Did it never dawn on Ms. Dremousis that Trent's brain cancer and her CFS could be virologically related? Is she unread on the subject of CFS. No book in her library by Hillary Johnson or Neenyah Ostrom? No awareness of the New York Native? Really? Ms. Dremousis seems to be some kind of intellectual. She writes, "I give literary readings several times a year and am diligently working on the manuscript for my second book." We suspect she has a library card or access to Amazon.com. What gives?
It is uncanny that Ms. Dremousis notes, "Our relationship became a constant cycle of doctor appointments and medical tests — and the stress eroded the joy we once found in each other. And because everyone asks: Yes, of course we had sex. All the time. Even at my sickest, I’ve been sexually active. I’m disabled, not dead." For anyone familiar to HHV-6, that could be called "sex in an HHV-6 cluster." Otherwise known as the new normal in sex these days, thanks to our NIH and CDC.
The irony burns like Hiroshima when she write, "I remain optimistic. Each relationship I’m in is affected by my health. For instance: Am I strong enough to go to the movies tonight, or should we stay in and watch Netflix? Can we eat breakfast with the curtains open, or are my eyes too light-sensitive this morning? For a relationship to be successful, the person I’m with has to be empathetic and understand that some things are beyond my physical control. Yet so many of these relationships have profoundly enriched my life. I’d be foolish to waste the rest of my life convinced that I won’t find love."
Oh yes, the person she finds had better be empathetic and even downright forgiving because the big unspoken and unmentionable problem is that when she finds love, the person she gets involved with may have found a woman who is infected with a contagious virus that not only can cause Chronic Fatigue Syndrome and cancer but so many other illnesses that this website, which is devoted to reporting on them, now has over 1725 posts (as of this day).
May 15, 2016 HHV-6 University Editorial
If members of the so-called Chronic Fatigue Syndrome community really want to get to the bottom of their epidemic (and sometimes we doubt that is true), they should stop making sob sister documentaries and prancing around with their underwear outside of their clothes. One more boo-hoo story about how awful CFS is will just make the world yawn and say, "Get in line, buddy. We all have problems." The misguided underwear-on-the-outside campaign will only make the patients look silly, but we won't get into that here.
Chronic Fatigue Syndrome is first and foremost a political matter. Untrustworthy scientists in power are controlling and masking what the public knows about CFS. Anyone who has watched the CFS narrative unfold, in all of its sociopathic glory, knows that what is being hidden from public consciousness is its obvious contagiousness and the intertwined relationship between CFS, AIDS and HHV-6. For more on that we suggest you look at some of the hundreds of posts on HHV-6 University.
Stop whining. Stop being silly. Get political. Face facts. Get real.
If the contagious nature of their illness and the relationship between CFS, AIDS and HHV-6 are too much truth for CFS patients, then Houston, we have a real problem. If CFS patients, researchers and activists can't handle the truth, they're destined to live out the rest of their days in a cockamamie wild goose chase full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.
Another Reason James Curran Should be Asked to Resign from Emory University
When historians attempt to deconstruct the sociopathic science that has given us the cover-up of a major HIV/AIDS Ponzi scheme and a massive epidemic of diseases related to HHV-6 (like AIDS, Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, etc.), they should look closely at a shocking moment back in the 80s when the CDC's James Curran (now a Dean at Emory University) altered AIDS research data.
In Science Fictions, John Crewdson's meticulous documentation of the frauds of Robert Gallo, the scientist who makes Bernie Madoff look like Mother Teresa, that moment is described. Under political pressure to name something the cause of AIDS, James Curran, then a kind of de facto AIDS Czar, basically did something scientists often do when their data doesn't perfectly fit their hypothesis: he altered it.
Gallo, as everyone now knows, stole the so-called exogenous retrovirus that the French scientists at the Pasteur Institute supposedly found in AIDS patients. Gallo and his toadies then created their own fraudulent test from their stolen French retrovirus and then, in Three-Card-Monte fashion, they had an Americanized test for an Americanized retrovirus. When the Centers for Disease Control compared the French and Gallo tests for accuracy, according to Crewdson, the Pasteur Institute's test was slightly better. According to Crewdson, in typical Gallo style, he wanted the CDC to alter the results so as to reflect a better score for Gallo's version of the test. It was just another day in the sociopathic science of AIDS, so of course James Curran agreed to Gallo's outrageous request.
This is just another reason Emory University immediately should ask for the resignation of James Curran, a scientific crook who should not be the Dean of the Rollins School of Public Health. Unless of course the whole purpose of universities is to turn out sociopathic scientists who can compete against other sociopathic scientists in the brave new world of sociopathic science that AIDS and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome research have created.
Previous HHV-6 University Editorials
June 10, 2016 HHV-6 University Editorial
It's time for the students and faculty at Emory University to dump James Curran, one of the people who helped craft the homophobic, racist and sociopathic science of AIDS and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome. Why is he the Dean of the Rollins School of Public Health?
The Centers for Disease Control’s James
Curran was one of the chief architects of the original AIDS paradigm. Curran
had the perfect medical background for laying down the formative
heterosexually-biased interpretations of the early data that epidemiologists
gathered about the sick gay men who were thought to be the patients zero of a
new supposedly gay epidemic. Jacob Levinsen described Curran in The Story of
AIDS and Black America: “ . . . Jim Curran, the Chief of the CDC’s Venereal
Disease Control Division was tapped to head up a Kaposi’s Sarcoma and
Opportunistic Infection Task Force. Despite being short staffed and
underfunded, the Task Force managed to bring together experts from diverse
fields like virology, cancer, and parasitic diseases in addition to a small
team of epidemiological intelligence officers, who were the agency’s foot
soldiers for disease prevention. . . . He had done quite a bit of work on
hepatitis B with gay men in the 1970s, and he almost immediately suspected that
the had a similar sexually transmitted and blood borne disease on their hands.”
( The Story of AIDS and Black America) And that suspicion paved
the way for one of the biggest conceptual mistakes in the history of
epidemiology.
According to Shilts’s Band, when
Curran saw the first reports on PCP in gay men, he wrote an odd note to one of
his colleagues saying “Hot stuff. Hot stuff.” (ATBPO p.67) Shilts also
described a rather revealing meeting at a subsequent CDC conference at which
Curran was briefed on the sexual behavior of gay men by a gay physician named
David Ostrow. According to Shilts, “Ostrow mused on the years he had spent
getting Curran and Dr. Jaffe [Curran’s CDC colleague] acculturated to the
gritty details of gay sexual habits. . . . Curran had seemed uptight at the
start, Ostrow thought, but he buckled down to his work. Both Jaffe and Curran
were unusual in that federal officials rarely had any kind of contact with
gays, and the few who did rarely wanted to hear detailed gymnastics of gay sex.”
(ATBPO p. 68) They clearly buckled down to their work a little too
well. With their heterosexual sense of noblesse oblige (venereal division),
these high-level clap doctors gone wild, set out to understand what the
mysterious new gay epidemic was all about. Gay men would have run for the hills
or hidden in basements if they had known what would result from the efforts of
these two quick learners about “the gymnastics of gay sex” who were headed
their way. Again, I must point out, if only the CDC had recognized the 1980
DuBois CFS cases as the actual beginning of the AIDS/CFS/autism pandemic of
HHV-6, the two quick learners might never have gotten their mitts on the “hot
stuff’ that was happening in the gay community. They never would have become
experts on the joy of gay sex.
Curran was married and the father of two
children. Three days into what he thought was the sexually transmitted epidemic
he was examining gay patients and, already, according to Shilts, he “was struck
by how identifiably gay all the patients seemed to be (ATBPO p.70) These
gays were apparently really gay, not the plainclothes kind who could
pass. According to Shilts, these gays “hadn’t just peeked out of the closet
yesterday.” (ATBPO p.71) It may have been the perceived intense gayness
of the first patients—the really gay ones—that resulted in Curran’s huge,
consequential mistake of erecting a mostly gay venereal epidemiological
paradigm that would become the virtual thirty year hate crime against all gays,
both the ones who could pass and the ones who were really gay. It wasn’t
just the patients who were strange. The strangeness of the people who had the
disease would inspire a strange new kind of science, epidemiology and virology
that was in essence “homodemiology.” It was destined to make everything worse
for gays and everyone else who had the bad luck of getting caught up in the
CDC’s paradigm. And that would ultimately even include members of the
heterosexual general population.
Shilts tried to capture Curran’s thought
process when he wrote, “It was strange because diseases tended not to strike
people on the basis of social group.” (ATBPO p.71) He added that “To Curran’s recollection . . .
No epidemic had chosen victims on the basis of how they identified themselves
in social terms, much less on the basis of sexual lifestyle. Yet, this
identification and a propensity for venereal diseases were the only things the
patients from three cities—New York, Los Angeles, and San Francisco—appeared to
share. There had to be something within this milieu that was hazardous to these
people’s health. (ATBPO p. 71) Well, there certainly was something about to
enter this “milieu” that would be extremely hazardous to these people’s health,
and that was Curran himself and his merry band of gay-sex-obsessed groupthinking
epidemiologists who were about to hang the albatross of the venereal AIDS
paradigm around the neck of the entire gay community.
When Shilts discussed Curran confronting
“sociological issues” that were involved in the mysterious illness, it escaped
Shilts that Curran and his associates were themselves sociological (and
political) issues as they plopped themselves in the middle of the gay
community (at a time when the community was most vulnerable and nearly
hysterical) with all of their own peculiar heterosexual and heterosexist
baggage. According to Shilts, “About a dozen staffers from all the disciplines
potentially involved with the diseases volunteered for the working group. They
included specialists in immunology, venereology, virology, cancer epidemiology,
toxicology and sociology. Because the outbreak might be linked to the Gay Bowel
Syndrome, parasitologists were called in. (ATBPO p. 71) The fact that
any illness was labeled “Gay” should probably have been a red flag for the kind
of heterosexist thinking that would soon be rolling across the gay community
like a tsunami.
Once the guiding gay-obsessed premise (an
example of a Arendtian “image“) was set, it was a matter of gay epidemiological
garbage in and gay epidemiological garbage out. Questions with mistaken
premises were about to lead the researchers and their medical victims down a
deadly primrose path. Shilts summed up the basic direction of the inquiry:
“Researchers also sought to determine whether the disease was indeed
geographically isolated in the three gay urban centers. Did the detection of
cases in the three centers make the patients appear to be only fast-lane gays
because gay life tended toward the fast track in those cities? Was the disease
all over gay America but in such low numbers that it had not been detected?” (ATBPO
p. 81) Now we know, of course that there was indeed something else out
there, but not just “all over gay America.” Something wasn’t playing by the
rules of the CDC’s gay-obsessed epidemiology. Something was making even the
heterosexual DuBois Atlanta cases of 1980 ill, and those non-fast-lane, non-gay
cases represented what was going on all over straight general population
America in a whole spectrum of ways. Biased epidemiological premises
have consequences.
There is something almost laughable about
the notion of Curran’s CDC working group going out into the gay world and
asking themselves “What new element might have sparked this catastrophe.” (ATBPO
p.82) One brand new element in the gay community that actually was the most
significant spark for the coming catastrophe that was about to unfold was the
CDC’s own incompetence and heterosexist epidemiology.
Given the way AIDS would evolve into the
kind of abnormal science that doesn’t even require the usual rules of evidence,
common sense and logic associated with real science, it is interesting that
Curran did apply those old-fashioned rules early on when they were needed to
build the venereal AIDS paradigm. Shilts wrote, “To prove an infectious
disease, Curran knew, one had to establish Koch’s postulate. According to this
century-old paradigm, you must take an infectious agent from one animal, put it
into another, who becomes ill, and then take the infectious agent from the
second and inject it into still a third subject, who becomes ill with the same
disease.” (ATBPO p.105) Curran certainly tried to apply some semblance
of the paradigm—or the logic of it anyway—when, by finding people who had AIDS
often had slept with people who also had the disorder, he saw the links as a
kind of epidemiological proof of transmission even though they weren’t strictly
speaking the fulfillment of the animal experimentation inherent in Koch’s
postulate. At least Curran knew the basic rules of science. Unfortunately these
very same rules would subsequently be thrown out the window to maintain the belief
that the retrovirus eventually linked to AIDS was the one true cause of AIDS.
Had those Koch’s postulates been adhered to faithfully throughout the epidemic
we might be calling HHV-6 the virus of acquired immunodeficiency today and
there might have been no Holocaust II to write about.
The CDC, in an evolving and de facto
manner, conducted something that could be called “the Atlanta AIDS/CFS/autism
public relations experiment” at the expense of everyone‘s health. What I mean
by that coinage is a kind of postmodern public health political experiment in
which rather than truly controlling an epidemic by being truthful and effective
and scientific, the public health institutions of the CDC and the NIH tried to
control and manipulate everything the public knew about the epidemic of
AIDS/CFS/autism. It may have been quasi-innocent and simply the product of
unrecognized sexual bias and old-fashioned self-deception when it started, but
it evolved into something far more sinister and destructive. In the early days
of AIDS, as described by Shilts, Curran was seemingly the embodiment of
good-egg innocence when it came to the realization that it would be necessary
for him to figure out some way to get the media’s attention in order to
increase public pressure for providing the funding the CDC needed for AIDS
research. Unfortunately, the manipulation of the media by scientists or public
health officials can—and did—have grave consequences for scientific, medical
and epidemiological truth. In AIDS it became a kind of cancer.
In 1982 Curran appeared before a group of
gay physicians in New York and told them “It’s likely we’ll be working on this
most of our lives.” (ATBPO p. 134) Historians one day will want to probe
deeply into whether he knew anything that everyone else didn’t know at that
point. At the very least, it was as though he was an inadvertent prophet. He
and his colleagues were indeed in the process of screwing things up for many
generations to come. Curran’s mistakes assured that his grandchildren’s grandchildren
will probably still be working on this problem. If they’re not autistic.
Shilts, in another moment of ironic
journalistic naiveté, wrote this about Curran: “As a federal employee Curran
had a thin line to walk between honesty and loyalty” (ATBPO p. 144) when
he was describing the AIDS situation to Congress. Shilts notes that Curran
could not ask Congress for money when he testified, “but he could nudge facts
toward logical conclusions.” (ATBPO p. 144) The nudging of facts would
become an art form at the CDC over the next three decades and sometimes the
facts that had to be nudged were so large they virtually had to be moved with
bulldozers and the conclusions they were nudged towards were always more
political than logical. One could almost faint from the irony of Curran telling
Congress in 1982 (two years after those first Atlanta DuBois cases of immune
dysfunction, “The epidemic may extend much further than currently described and
may include other cancers as well as thousands of persons with immune defects.”
(ATBPO p. 144) Had he or his colleagues at the CDC recognized the DuBois
1980 Atlanta cases as the canaries in the HHV-6 mine, he would have been
talking about millions (if not billions) of cases and he would not have had to
play games with words to get Congress and the White House to do the right thing
financially. One disturbing aspect of his manner of thinking was reflected in
how Shilts summed up his testimony: “With death rates soaring to 75 percent
among people diagnosed with GRID for two years, the specter of 100 percent
fatality from the syndrome loomed ahead, he added.” (ATBPO p.144) It
would be nearly impossible to dial back on the distorted image of the epidemic
he was presenting and frankly, dialing back on anything was something that the
CDC (like the NIH) would turn out to be constitutionally unable to do. That, as
we have said, is another sign that we are living in a period of totalitarian
abnormal science.
Curran’s peculiar attitude towards gays
surfaced revealingly again when Shilts described his refusal to meet Gaetan
Dugas, the unfortunate gay man who would be eternally scapegoated in the echo
chambers of the media as the “Patient Zero” of the AIDS epidemic because he had
supposedly slept with a number of the original AIDS cases: “Jim Curran passed
up the opportunity to meet Gaetan, the Quebecois version of Typhoid Mary.
Curran had heard about the flamboyant [flight] attendant and frankly found
every story about his sexual braggadocio to be offensive. Stereotypical gays
irritated Curran in much the same way that he was uncomfortable watching Amos
n’ Andy movies.” (ATBPO p.158) One doesn’t know quite where to begin on
this one, except to note that Curran would be able to use his clap-doctor and
gay-obsessed epidemiology to act on his feelings and beliefs about both
stereotypical and non-stereotypical gays, and every other kind of gay in
between. The way that Shilts described Gaetan Dugas should have been a warning
to the whole gay community of what kind of medical and social treatment was in
store for them: “Gaetan Dugas later complained to friends that the CDC had
treated him like a laboratory rat during his stay in Atlanta, with little
groups of doctors going in and out of his hospital room. He’d had his skin
cancer for two years now, he said, and he was sick of being a guinea pig for
doctors who didn’t have the slightest idea what they were doing.” (ATBPO
p.158) Of course when those doctors eventually thought they had figured
out what they were doing—that was precisely when they really didn’t really have
a clue about what they were doing. The Holocaust II era of the gay guinea pig
had only just begun. The CDC’s epidemiology would create a whole new gay
stereotype. Curran’s difficulty in getting researchers to come into the field
was the fallout of the gay and sexual way the frightening disease had been
framed for the public—something that might never have happened if the DuBois
1980 wholesome heterosexual Atlanta cases had been the epidemiological and
virological template for the epidemic rather than the kind of Amos n’ Andy gay
people that made Curran so jiggy with embarrassment that he wouldn’t even meet
with them.
It’s amazing how many people seem to have
been assigned credit (by different sources) for bringing (dragging?) Robert
Gallo into AIDS research. Shilts has Curran on that Washington-slept-here list
too, noting that he said to Gallo when he was receiving an award at a medical
conference in 1982, “You’ve won one award. You should come back when you win
another award for working on AIDS.” (ATBPO p. 201) Bringing Gallo into
the field was like putting a pair of retrovirus-obsessed eyeglasses over a pair
of gay VD-obsessed eyeglasses and expecting to see the epidemic for what it
was. Otherwise known as the blind recruiting the blind.
One of the more grimly amusing passages in
Shilts’s book concerns Curran’s thought about the fears in the gay community
that AIDS would result in gays being put into concentration camps: “Curran
thought the train of thought was curious. After all, nobody had suggested or
even hinted that gays should be in any way quarantined for AIDS. The right-wing
loonies who might propose such a ‘final solution’ were not paying enough
attention to the disease to construct the Dachau scenario. Still, it was
virtually an article of faith among homosexuals that they should end up in
concentration camps.” (ATBPO p. 228) Silly gays. Frankly, who needed
concentration camps or “the Dachau scenario” when you had CDC epidemiology. CDC
epidemiology saved the country a load of money on barbed wire. And Holocaust I,
where gays actually were made to wear pink triangles in real concentration
camps—that was so 1940s.
One of the most unfortunate and tragically
wrongheaded things about Curran is that, according to Shilts, he held his
colleague Donald Francis “in awe, given Francis’s international reputation for
smallpox control.” (ATBPO p.262) As one looks back at the circle jerk
that also got Holocaust I going, one might hypothesize that all holocausts
begin in passionate mutual admirations societies.
Something began to surface during James
Curran’s reign over AIDS at the CDC that bears close scrutiny by any
enterprising historian interested in identifying the institutional roots of
Holocaust II. In 1983, when Susan Steinmetz, an aide to Congressman Ted Weiss,
visited the CDC in an oversight capacity, she was prevented from seeing files
she automatically should have been able to audit as a representative of a
Congressional Committee that had oversight responsibilities on health and the
environment. According to Shilts, she was told by the then CDC Director William
Foege, “she would not have access to any CDC files, and she could not talk to
any CDC researchers without having management personnel in the room to monitor
the conversations. The agency also needed a written, detailed list of specific
documents and files Steinmetz wanted to see.” (ATBPO p.292) Shilts
reported that “Steinmetz was flabbergasted. What did they think oversight
committees did? Their work routinely involved poring through government files
to determine the truth of what the high-muck-a-mucks denied, and then privately
talking to employees who, without the prying eyes of their bosses, could tell
the truth. This was understood, she thought.” (ATBPO p.292) What she
didn’t realize was that the CDC’s de facto little counterrevolution against
science and the ideal of transparency in democratic processes had begun before
her unassuming eyes and this would become business as usual at the clandestine
CDC for the next three decades. The shroud of secrecy (de rigueur in all
abnormal science) that would enable Holocaust II and the cover-up of the CFS,
autism and Morgellons epidemics was descending on the CDC in Atlanta.
While Steinmetz was just trying to find
memos that would contradict the CDC’s public posture that it had enough money
to research the emerging epidemic of AIDS, without realizing it, she had
stumbled onto the fact that the CDC had begun acting more like a government
intelligence agency with vital national secrets—possibly even embarrassing
ones—to keep, than a public health organization that was committed to truthful
science and was accountable to the American people. In essence the CDC was
showing that it wasn’t above any of the legerdemain that any other part of the
government was capable of. It was showing us that it was very much cut from the
same cloth as the government gremlins that gave us Watergate and Vietnam.
Steinmetz wanted to see files that
pertained to budgets and planning, but she was bizarrely told that she couldn’t
see the files because they had patients names in them and that violated patient
confidentiality. It strained credulity to argue that patients names were involved
in organization budgets and planning. and in retrospect, it was a very lame
excuse. This wouldn’t be the first time in Holocaust II that a dishonest
explanation with a fake concern and compassion for patients’ welfare would be
used by those in authority to stonewall the very people who were actually
trying to do something about the welfare of patients. The CDC was
already in a paranoid circle-the-wagons mode that characterizes abnormal and
totalitarian science. According to Shilts, “The CDC personnel, who struck
Steinmetz as peculiarly contentious, wanted to conduct their own review of the
files before letting Steinmetz see them . . .” (ATBPO p. 292) And “as
another demand, the CDC insisted that before any interviews with CDC staff took
place, the agency would screen questions that Susan Steinmetz put to
scientists.” (ATBPO p.292) On the eve of the HHV-6 catastrophe and
Holocaust II, government science was going into the lockdown of abnormal
science. Shilts wrote, “This is getting pretty strange, Steinmetz thought.” (ATBPO
p.292) Strangeness was but a puppy at that point.
This new emerging opposite world of public
health and scientific duplicity and defensiveness didn’t make sense to
Steinmetz’s colleagues back in D.C.: “On the phone, other oversight committee
staffers in Washington confided that they had never heard of an agency so
recalcitrant to Congress . . .” (ATBPO p.292) It got even worse for
Steinmetz at the CDC in Atlanta when, on the second day of her oversight visit,
she was told by the CDC manager who was handling her visit that her “presence
would no longer be permitted in the CDC building and that no agency personnel
would be allowed to speak to her.” (ATBPO p. 293) The stonewalling and
the lockdown were not confined to the CDC in Atlanta. Shilts reported that
Steinmetz also faced new obstacles in her path when “The National Cancer
Institute officials issued a memo demanding that all interviews with
researchers be monitored by the agency’s congressional liaison. At first the
National Institutes for Allergy and Infectious Disease was cooperative, but
then, in an apparent NIH-wide clampdown, information became difficult to
excavate there as well.” (ATBPO p.293) Science and public health in
America were about to play the same kinds of political games that are played in
totalitarian countries. Public health information was about to be totally
controlled by the government.
Curran can himself take a great deal of
personal credit for the HIV mistake. Shilts writes that “During the summer of
1983, Dr. James Curran had grown fond of citing the ‘Willie Sutton Law’ as
evidence that AIDS was caused by a retrovirus. The notorious bank bandit Willie
Sutton was asked once why he robbed banks, to which he replied, “Because that’s
where the money is.” Curran, according to Shilts, would ask “’Where should we
[at the CDC] put our money? . . . ‘Where would Willie Sutton go? He would go
with retroviruses, I think right now.’” (ATBPO p. 331) There is a
revealing amount of cockiness and arrogance in Curran that remind one that
pride goeth before a fall. But one Willie Suttonish thing was certainly true:
retroviruses turned out to be exactly where the big money was for a number of
dishonest and incompetent retrovirologists
It is fascinating to see Shilts catching
Curran red-handed as he lies about the inadequate funding for AIDS. Publicly
Curran would say “we have everything we need,” (ARBPO p.331) but Shilts
was able to use the Freedom of Information Act to locate documents that
“revealed that things were not so rosy at the CDC, and Curran knew it. Even
while he reassured gay doctors in San Francisco, he was writing memos to his
superiors begging for more money.” (ATBPO p. 331) For anymore cognizant
of the overwhelming mendacity that characterized just about everything
concerning Holocaust II, it is especially disturbing to read Shilts’s account
of Curran’s excuse: “‘It’s hard to explain to people outside the system,’ he
said. ‘It’s two different things to work within the system for a goal and
talking to the people outside the system for that goal,’ he said.” (ATBPO
p. 332) Curran was basically making the anti-transparency excuses people inside
of the government always make for talking out of both sides of their mouths.
It’s too bad Shilts didn’t consider the possibility that this character trait
was also reflected in the basic science and epidemiology of AIDS that was being
churned out by the CDC. It would turn out over the next few decades that indeed
government science spoke out of both sides of its mouth.
Curran got the venereal HIV/AIDS paradigm
he and his colleagues wanted, the one that could be expected to materialize
given his background. It wasn’t surprising then, that he said in 1984,
according to Shilts, “Gay men need to know that if they’re going to have
promiscuous sex, they’ll have the life expectancies of people in the developing
world.” (ATBPO p.416) Actually, given the crazy treatments some gay men
were going to be medically assaulted with, he was a true visionary.
As could be predicted, according to
Shilts, “Jim Curran also viewed testing as essential to any long term strategy
in fighting AIDS.” And so the Pink Triangle medical apartheid agenda of testing
and stigmatizing gays as HIV positive (or as an HIV risk group) began in earnest.
And the gay community got specially tailored forms of communication from
Curran. According to Shilts, “Curran was always cautious when he talked to
newspaper reporters, fearful that his observations on the future of the AIDS
epidemic might be fashioned into the stuff of sensational headlines, but he
felt no inhibition with the gay community. Instead he felt his mission was to
constantly stress the gravity of the unfolding epidemic.” (ATBPO p.483)
Of course, while he was giving the gay community the tough love, behind his
epidemiological back was the looming HHV-6 spectrum catastrophe, a situation
which was exponentially worse than anything his little team of clap doctors and
pseudo-epidemiologists could possibly have imagined. Given that it was the CDC’s
AIDS paradigm that in essence scapegoated the gay community for what would turn
out to be everyone’s HHV-6 problem, it is the epitome of irony that according
to Shilts, Curran thought that “the question was not if there would be a
backlash against gays, but when. It might come soon. ‘You should get ready for
it,’ he said.” (ATBPO p.484) How does one prepare for a backlash against
gays? Buy extra canned goods? Bake an extra quiche? It was certainly nice of
him to give the gay community a heads up, but in truth, the pseudoscience, the
incompetent fact-gathering implicit in ignoring the DuBois 1980 Atlanta cases,
and the homodemiology of the CDC, constituted a kind of epidemiological backlash before the
backlash. Curran and his team needed only look in the mirror to see the kind of
anti-gay values that could do far more mischief to the gay community than an
army of right wing loons.
Journalist David Black caught some of the
underlying psychological problems at the CDC in his book The Plague Years.
He wrote, “In fact the CDC, like many physicians and scientists, seemed
embarrassed by the gayness of the disease.” (TPY p.57) We now know only
too well in retrospect is that the best science and epidemiology can not be
conducted in an atmosphere of gay-sex-related embarrassment. Black quoted one
CDC researcher as saying to a visiting gay activist, “This never would have
happened if you guys had gotten married.” (TPY p.57) When the activist
asked if the researcher meant to each other, the researcher said, “To women.” (TPY
p.58) The CDC researchers conducted their epidemiology and science in an
awkward atmosphere of antipathy to gays, surely not a fertile field for
objectivity. According to Black, when he asked Curran to explain exactly what
he means by “‘intimate contact’ [between men] the phrase researchers kept using
to describe the conditions under which the syndrome spread, he seemed
uncomfortable, squeamish. He stammered and glanced anxiously around the room.”
(TPY p.58) If some of Jim Curran’s best friends were gay, they had
clearly done very little to make him comfortable with their sex lives. One
suspects that most of Jim Curran’s best friends were not gay.
One absolutely show-stopping moment in
Black’s rich little book is a criticism that was leveled at Curran: “He started
making up these ‘facts’ from the data as he interpreted it,’ said one unnamed
gay critic of Curran.” Who was that astute gay critic? Please stand up now,
take your bow.
June 9, 2016 HHV-6 University Editorial
It's time to reconsider the Jane Teas African Swine Fever Virus AIDS Hypothesis
McInnis and Gregg suspect iridovirus — a virus that suppresses the immune system — could be infecting honeybees and keeping them from returning to their colonies. The virus, McInnis said, may have an “AIDS-like effect” on the bees, making them more susceptible to common diseases that wouldn’t normally be fatal to them.“I think this could be earth-shattering information if we’re right. Everybody depends on honeybees to help grow the food that we eat,” said Gregg, who while working at Plum Island treated African swine fever in pigs — a virus similar to the one he’s investigating with McInnis. “Most other people trying to solve this problem are looking at pesticide use. There are very few others who are investigating the possible spread of a virus." (Newsday, June 7, 2016)
Now that African Swine Fever is back in the news in the context of an AIDS epidemic in bees that is causing colony collapse disorder, it's time to reconsider the hypothesis of Jane Teas that African Swine Fever is the real cause of AIDS. What is the relationship of African Swine Fever to HHV-6 and HHV-8? Is African Swine Fever really the trigger for both AIDS and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome? Are American pigs now infected with some new strains of African Swine Fever Virus? There are a number of articles on Jane Teas and her colleague John Beldekas available on the internet. Here is one at Spin Magazine. And here is an AP story that appeared in The New York Times.
June 4, 2016 HHV-6 University Editorial
Before Ron Davis, Ian Lipkin and Maureen Hanson start doing new rounds of CFS hocus-pocus in their laboratories, we suggest they test what could be called the Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Metahypothesis.
The Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Metahypothesis:
For over three decades, the Centers for Disease Control has been covering up the relationship between so-called AIDS and so-called Chronic Fatigue Syndrome by a massive deception and self-deception involving nosology, epidemiology, HIV and HHV/6/7/8 fraud.
Capiche?
(Please read and reread this metahypothesis very, very carefully and make sure you thoroughly understand it before any research commences. Ponder its implications before you even start to form your own hypotheses.)
Good luck testing the Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Metahypothesis! If you ignore it may the best CFS hocus-pocus win!
June 1, 2016 HHV-6 Editorial
Ron Davis, CFS Reinvent-the-Wheelism and CFS Virgin Birtherism
Geneticist Ron Davis, who has a son suffering terribly with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, is getting involved with CFS research. According to the End ME.CFS Project, "Under the guidance of world-renowned geneticist Ronald W. Davis, PhD., we have brought in top experts in a variety of fields for a bold and new collaborative research project. Our ultimate goal is unlocking the mystery of myalgic encephalomyelitis / chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) and end the suffering caused by the disease. The project’s first study is the ME/CFS Severely Ill-Big DATA Study that is designed to find a clinically useful diagnostic biomarker."
Cool, right? Open the champagne, right? World-renowned? Whoopty do!
Not so fast.
We fear all this smells of "CFS Reinventing-the-Wheelism" and "CFS Virgin Birtherism."
Anyone who comes to CFS and starts throwing around the word "mystery" has a serious ethical problem. Scientists are not supposed to ignore previous work on something they are researching. When they do that in the realm of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, you pretty much know you are in the presence of "CFS Reinventing-the-Wheelism." You also know you are in the presence of the kind of naive folks who think that science is not political and government scientists never lie about anything. Poor things. Sad.
There are hundreds of studies about Chronic Fatigue Syndrome that make this illness very unmysterious. Painfully so.
Read the work of Hillary Johnson and Neenyah Ostrom and ten years of reporting on Chronic Fatigue Syndrome in New York Native.
To call it mysterious is to promote a very Big Lie.
All of the science that has been published on Chronic Fatigue Syndrome is bullshit? Says who? A renowned geneticist? One who wears his underpants on the outside of his pants and a cape?
What is mysterious is the cockamamie act of CFS scientists ignoring what has preceded them.What is mysterious is CFS scientists ignoring all the damage HHV-6 is doing to the bodies of CFS patients.
Over the years a number of scientific narcissists (Hello Ian Lipkin!) have entered the field who have basically implied that nobody should worry because now a real rootin'-tootin' scientist has arrived. These narcissists generally are anti-history and anti-intellectual and have have not bothered to do their homework, But then scientists are not paid to read deeply or widely, think or seriously challenge authority. (Read Betrayers of the Truth if you have any doubt about that).
Does Ron Davis have a clue about the sociopathic science that forms the foundation of the CFS and AIDS cover-up? We doubt it. We suspect that his illustrious colleagues are probably clueless, too. A new variation of an old-boy network is not the antidote to an ongoing era of sociopathic science.
One of the nonmysteries about CFS is that it is transmissible. Families come down with it. Orchestras, classes, people who have slept with the same woman who was suffering from CFS. (Go to the index in Johnson's Osler's Web and check out "transmission" in the index.)
To not talk about transmission is to go down the road of "CFS Virgin Birtherism," a belief that somehow, out of nowhere, one suddenly comes down with CFS, a disease that should be called AIDS Lite or AIDS Spectrum Disease, but never is by the politically correct CFS crowd that is trying to control the activist narrative. (They would rather die than talk about the intertwined relationship of CFS and AIDS. Unfortunately, many have.)
To talk about Chronic Fatigue Syndrome and AIDS in the same breath results in the kind of exile that Judy Mikovits has experienced. First Mikovits was screwed by the scientific establishment for basically finding AIDS-like retroviral activity in CFS and now she is being screwed by the CFS community for referring to CFS as "Non-HIV AIDS." In a world of sociopathic science she just can win for losing.
The big questions directed at Ron Davis should be "Does your son possibly have a virus or some other agent that he is capable of spreading to you and the rest of your family? Are you already infected and showing the effects of that agent in different ways? Can people who come in close contact with your son develop the disease? Can they then infect other people? Has that agent been spreading for over three decades and are millions of people now on the CFS Spectrum or more appropriately, the AIDS Spectrum? Is your son just one of many millions of infected people who are victims of a pandemic that has been ignored at best and covered up at worst? Are scientists emphasizing genetics actually aiding and abetting a public health cover-up of a contagious illness capable of destroying the immune system?"
If Davis thinks that such questions don't really matter and we just need a genetics genius like him and a team of big names (all male) to ride in on white horses and reinvent the CFS wheel, then we suggest that he could be of more use running around the world with his underpants on the outside of his clothes (he is pictured below). Nothing gets the world's attention more than a world-renowned geneticist wearing his underwear outside of his pants. If his science is as good as his public relations strategies, all CFS patients should make sure their wills are in order.
A renowned geneticist who will save the world.
May 25, 2016 HHV-6 Editorial
The Millions Missing campaign utilizing shoes is perhaps the most effective effort we have yet seen on behalf of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome. Congratulations to everyone behind it. You're hitting it out of the park.
We have a suggestion.
Everyone involved should now send one of their shoes to Francis Collins at the National Institutes of Health (9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, Maryland 20892). The other shoe should be sent to Anthony Fauci at the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (3012 43rd St NW, Washington, DC 20016).
We have little doubt that every major media outlet in the country would eventually cover this story.
May 24, HHV-6 Editorial
How Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Threatens to Expose AIDS Czar Fauci and the CDC's Perfect Scientific Crime
Chronic Fatigue Syndrome sufferers are constantly puzzled by the remorselessly contemptuous manner in which they are treated by AIDS Czar Anthony Fauci and government scientists at the CDC. Hillary Johnson did a wonderful job of capturing that contempt in her masterpiece Osler's Web.
The treatment has been uncanny and never seems to really change. The patients cry, "Why, why, why, why?" To many it makes no sense. Many of the sufferers are white middle class heterosexuals are used to being treated with a modicum of respect from their government and its bureaucrats. They feel a certain amount of white heterosexual privilege and just can't fathom why they are being so ruthlessly disrespected and "disappeared."
The patients don't realize that they are being gaslighted by a grotesque empire of sociopathic science. The patients are treated like they are whiny nuts. When they complain they are almost driven crazy by sadistically being told that they are crazy.
It's a shame that CFS community doesn't understand what is going on. Patients operate from a basis of naive good faith, totally unaware that they are petitioning a system full of all the bad faith and consciencelessness that is characteristic of sociopaths and sociopathic science.
Chronic Fatigue Syndrome patients do not understand that they are potentially ruining and exposing a perfect sociopathic scientific crime. Sociopaths hate when they are recognized for what they are and the sociopaths who are in charge of AIDS are no different from classic sociopaths.
Wikipedia defines a perfect crime: "Perfect crime is a colloquial term used in law and fiction (especially crime fiction) to characterize crimes that are undetected, unattributed to a perpetrator, or else unsolved as a kind of technical achievement on the part of the perpetrator. In certain contexts, the concept of perfect crime is limited to just undetected crimes; if an event is ever identified as a crime, some investigators say it cannot be called 'perfect.'"
By not recognizing exactly what Fauci and the CDC are doing, CFS patients help keep a perfect crime "perfect."
Serious research into Chronic Fatigue Syndrome from day one has always pointed to a relationship between Chronic Fatigue Syndrome and AIDS. Anyone who disputes that is either seriously uninformed or lying to themselves. Newbies should start their research with the 1990 paper by Nancy Klimas in which she describes as "a form of acquired immunodeficiency." Hello!
Chronic Fatigue Syndrome ruins the perfect crime of systemic AIDS fraud.
Chronic Fatigue Syndrome threatens to expose the perfect crime of AIDS epidemiological fraud.
Chronic Fatigue Syndrome threatens to show that AIDS Czar Anthony Fauci has been in charge of one of the most perfect scientific crimes in the history of mankind.
Chronic Fatigue Syndrome threatens to expose the massive retroviral fraud that has been used to cover up what HHV-6 is and what it does. (This goes for HHV-7 and HHV-8 too.)
When Elaine DeFrieitas detected some retroviral activity in CFS and tried valiantly to sort it out, she came too close to exposing the fraud of HIV and the cover-up of HHV-6 and HERV-K18. She had to be derailed.
The same thing happened to Judy Mikovits when she detected retroviral activity in CFS and got too close to exposing the perfect scientific crime of HIV fraud and the cover-up of HHV-6 and HERV-K18. Mikovits now sadly and pathetically travels around the country doing talk shows and giving interviews in which she describes CFS as "Non-HIV AIDS." CFS patients don't like to talk about her as much as they once did because "Non-HIV AIDS" is just a little too much truth for their tastes. And the AIDS establishment must also be terrified of that expression because it is yet another threat to the perfect scientific crimes that AIDS pseudoscience and pseudo-epidmiology are.
Chronic Fatigue Syndrome patients who treat AIDS as a separate epidemic have basically become accessories to AIDS Czar Fauci and the CDC's perfect scientific crime. The inconvenient truth is that they have become Fauci's useful idiots and his enablers.
Until CFS patients can accept the relationship between CFS and AIDS, the sociopathic science of Fauci and the CDC will continue to roll over them with impunity.
May 21, 2016 HHV-6 University Editorial
Is Ian Lipkin Some Kind of Idiot?
“ME/CFS is a global problem that we need to address – it robs people
of the most productive years of their lives, it causes immunological
dysfunction, profound fatigue, cognitive dysfunction. It really
destroys peoples’ lives. It is underappreciated, it is underfunded,
and with your support we hope to find solutions to this crippling
problem”. ~Dr. Ian Lipkin
If Ian Lipkin doesn't see Chronic Fatigue Syndrome as part of the AIDS epidemic and if he doesn't examine the role of HHV-6 in CFS as well as the endogenous superantigen retrovirus HERV-K18 it transactivates, then he is just playing games with people's lives and money. At best he is an enabler of the socipathic science that has characterized CFS/AIDS research for over three decades. At worst he is just another CFS/AIDS charlatan and rip-off artist.
Lipkin needs the members of the CFS community to play his patsies. Don't oblige him.
May 16, 2016 HHV-6 University Editorial
Dating while Disabled (Uhhhh, with a Contagious Disease)????
Litsa Dremousis has written a an op-ed piece in The Washington Post that raises questions she seems to not even be aware of. The title of the piece, "Dating while disabled: From Day One with someone new, I feel vulnerable" immediately caught our attention.
Ms. Dremousis writes about breaking up with an man who had been her fiance "until two weeks ago." She notes, "when you’re disabled, you feel indebted every day, making dating that much harder than it is for the average person." As we read that sentence we thought, well, yes, especially since you have a contagious illness, Ms. Dremousis. She outlines some of the challenges: "And no matter how fiercely autonomous and intelligent you are, you’re starting each relationship as the one who needs help doing otherwise simple tasks, such as walking downstairs or driving. Even with healthy self-esteem, it’s hard not to feel intensively vulnerable."
We of course wondered about the challenges of the uninfected person without CFS who might end up dating her, someone who might be exposed to a contagious illness that seems to effect every system in the body. Oh, but that's their problem.
Ms. Desmousis is not slacker when it comes to describing CFS. She's not from the "too tired to get out of bed school" of CFS self-description. She writes, " . . . struggling with chronic fatigue syndrome makes me often feel as if I have a powerful flu. I deal with constant temperature fluctuations; extreme sensitivity to light and sound; dangerously low blood pressure; and fatigue so powerful it feels like a Buick is sitting on my chest." And she adds, "I’m unable to stay upright more than a few hours on a good day; for the past several years, I have needed to be wheeled through airports (if you think air travel is a nightmare, try doing it in a wheelchair). And when I’m on a plane or bus, I have to wear a surgical mask because my immune system is so compromised. Twice in recent years, someone else’s cold became my pneumonia."
She writes, "For 24 years I’ve had ME/CFS (formerly known as “chronic fatigue syndrome”), a disabling neuro-immune illness similar in many ways to multiple sclerosis" Imagine if she had written, "For 24 years I’ve had ME/CFS (formerly known as “chronic fatigue syndrome”), a contagious disabling neuro-immune illness similar in many ways to multiple sclerosis and AIDS. "If she had she would have been exiled from the CFS community and The Washington Post would probably not have published the piece in the first place.
But the real bombshell in the piece was what she wrote about Trent, her fiance: "Five days after Trent asked me to marry him, a routine check-up unearthed a brain tumor behind his left ear. A longtime professor, Trent is deeply intelligent and tenacious. We were in love and determined to remain upbeat about his prospects. I took care of him over six months, as we assembled his surgical team, spent a week in the hospital as he underwent and recovered from the successful but complicated brain surgery, and then as he went through months of physical therapy. I was his main source of emotional support, but it took a huge toll on my health."
While we sympathize with Ms Dremousis and Trent, what really turned our head was the possibility that the two of them might have shared something more than their love, namely a virus called . . . drum roll . . . HHV-6. For any newbies visiting HHV-6 University, we have done numerous items on the relationship between HHV-6 and cancer. HHV-6 is very oncogenic. Did we say very?
Did it never dawn on Ms. Dremousis that Trent's brain cancer and her CFS could be virologically related? Is she unread on the subject of CFS. No book in her library by Hillary Johnson or Neenyah Ostrom? No awareness of the New York Native? Really? Ms. Dremousis seems to be some kind of intellectual. She writes, "I give literary readings several times a year and am diligently working on the manuscript for my second book." We suspect she has a library card or access to Amazon.com. What gives?
It is uncanny that Ms. Dremousis notes, "Our relationship became a constant cycle of doctor appointments and medical tests — and the stress eroded the joy we once found in each other. And because everyone asks: Yes, of course we had sex. All the time. Even at my sickest, I’ve been sexually active. I’m disabled, not dead." For anyone familiar to HHV-6, that could be called "sex in an HHV-6 cluster." Otherwise known as the new normal in sex these days, thanks to our NIH and CDC.
The irony burns like Hiroshima when she write, "I remain optimistic. Each relationship I’m in is affected by my health. For instance: Am I strong enough to go to the movies tonight, or should we stay in and watch Netflix? Can we eat breakfast with the curtains open, or are my eyes too light-sensitive this morning? For a relationship to be successful, the person I’m with has to be empathetic and understand that some things are beyond my physical control. Yet so many of these relationships have profoundly enriched my life. I’d be foolish to waste the rest of my life convinced that I won’t find love."
Oh yes, the person she finds had better be empathetic and even downright forgiving because the big unspoken and unmentionable problem is that when she finds love, the person she gets involved with may have found a woman who is infected with a contagious virus that not only can cause Chronic Fatigue Syndrome and cancer but so many other illnesses that this website, which is devoted to reporting on them, now has over 1725 posts (as of this day).
May 15, 2016 HHV-6 University Editorial
If members of the so-called Chronic Fatigue Syndrome community really want to get to the bottom of their epidemic (and sometimes we doubt that is true), they should stop making sob sister documentaries and prancing around with their underwear outside of their clothes. One more boo-hoo story about how awful CFS is will just make the world yawn and say, "Get in line, buddy. We all have problems." The misguided underwear-on-the-outside campaign will only make the patients look silly, but we won't get into that here.
Chronic Fatigue Syndrome is first and foremost a political matter. Untrustworthy scientists in power are controlling and masking what the public knows about CFS. Anyone who has watched the CFS narrative unfold, in all of its sociopathic glory, knows that what is being hidden from public consciousness is its obvious contagiousness and the intertwined relationship between CFS, AIDS and HHV-6. For more on that we suggest you look at some of the hundreds of posts on HHV-6 University.
Stop whining. Stop being silly. Get political. Face facts. Get real.
If the contagious nature of their illness and the relationship between CFS, AIDS and HHV-6 are too much truth for CFS patients, then Houston, we have a real problem. If CFS patients, researchers and activists can't handle the truth, they're destined to live out the rest of their days in a cockamamie wild goose chase full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.