Would an HIV Replication Movement and Crisis prove that Duesberg was right about HIV even if he was wrong about AIDS?
What percentage of HIV science can't be replicated? Would failure to replicate HIV research reopen the Duesbergian challenge to the HIV theory of AIDS?
"Because the reproducibility of experiments is an essential part of the scientific method,[5] the inability to replicate the studies of others has potentially grave consequences for many fields of science in which significant theories are grounded on unreproducible experimental work."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Replication_crisis