The Big Medical Story the Media is Ignoring

Any journalist who says that Non-HIV AIDS isn't an
important story worthy of full investigative coverage
is a clown who belongs in the same class as the
clownish journalists who looked the other way when
AIDS first broke out.

On the website for Autoimmune Technologies, the story
is virtually spelled out for any enterprising
journalist:

Idiopathic CD4+ T-lymphocytopenia, or ICL, is an
immunodeficiency syndrome in which human
immunodeficiency virus, or HIV, cannot be detected.
Because HIV is the causative agent of acquired immune
deficiency syndrome (AIDS), ICL can be referred to as
Non-HIV AIDS. As in AIDS patients, Non-HIV AIDS
patients exhibit reduced numbers of CD4+
T-lymphocytes, and many Non-HIV AIDS patients have
developed the opportunistic infections or otherwise
rare cancers associated with AIDS.

Non-HIV AIDS patients may comprise perhaps one percentof all AIDS patients. While the majority of Non-HIV
AIDS patients do not belong to any of the risk groups
such as blood transfusion recipients, male
homosexuals, and intravenous drug abusers in which
AIDS was first identified, some Non-HIV AIDS patients
do belong to these groups. This suggests that Non-HIV
AIDS may also be transmissible.

Research conducted at Tulane University Medical Center
suggests that Non-HIV AIDS is associated with a
retroviral particle called Human Intracisternal A-Type
Particle-Type II, or HIAP-II. Antibodies to this
particle have been found in a high percentage of
patients with Non-HIV AIDS. Tulane has patented
HIAP-II, and Autoimmune Technologies is licensing
HIAP-II technology in order to develop screening and
diagnostic tests and therapies for Non-HIV AIDS and to
study the possibility of generating vaccines against
Non-HIV AIDS, autoimmune disease, and AIDS.

http://www.autoimmune.com/Non-HIVAIDSGen.html

One percent of all AIDS patients? That means there are
thousands (repeat, thousands) of cases out there.
Maybe something like 400,000 worldwide. And that's
400,000 people with transmissible non-HIV AIDS. And
it's not a page one story? Something is very wrong
with this picture.

It's amazing that Autoimmune Technologies is talking
about developing therapies and vaccines for Non-HIV
AIDS while we've yet to see a single serious story
about this in the media. Where are the Times, the
Washington Post and 60 Minutes? Where is "emerging
diseases" expert Laurie Garrett? Where are the Non-HIV
AIDS activists? Why is The New England Journal of
Medicine looking the other way? Is everyone suffering
epidemic fatigue? Are people afraid of confusing the
public about HIV with this second Non-HIV AIDS
epidemic? Are they afraid to tell the gay community?
Are they afraid that Non-HIV AIDS will give ammunition
to those who for two decades have questioned HIV's
role in AIDS?

Where are all the personal interest stories about
Non-HIV AIDS? It must be very strange for someone to
be told that they have Non-HIV AIDS. What do they tell
their sex partners--"Sorry, I don't have HIV, I have
Non-HIV." How come no obituaries say that people died
of complications of Non-HIV AIDS? Where are the
celebrities with Non-HIV AIDS? Is Non-HIV AIDS being
transmitted by the blood supply?

A few months back the media went nuts over the
possibility that there was a new more lethal strain of
HIV. And that was found in just one person. The fact
that people can contract Non-HIV AIDS strikes us as
being a far more important story with exponentially
far more serious implications for public health. The
media silence is deafening.

We do have to note that one person seems to be telling
her own story of dealing with something that sounds
a lot like Non-HIV AIDS:
http://lemonfoundation.blogspot.com/

If more patients start to speak out about their
struggles with Non-HIV AIDS, the media might be shamed
into giving the story the coverage it deserves.

If HHV-6 is the real cause of AIDS, here are some of the implications:

1. HIV is a massive scientific fraud. Something akin to a Ponzi scheme. Scientists who challenged the HIV theory of AIDS (the ones who have been thuggishly censored and silenced) turn out to be on the money.

2. Chronic Fatigue Syndrome and Autism (and many other so-called HHV-6 related mysterious epidemics) are part of the so-called AIDS epidemic.  Chronic Fatigue Syndrome and Autism both are clearly the results of the ravages of HHV-6.

3. AIDS and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome has been artificially and politically separated into two epidemics. We are living in a period of CFS/AIDS apartheid. So-called AIDS patients have to sit in the back of the HHV-6 epidemic bus while the befuddled HHV-6/CFS patients and HHV-6/Autism victims sit up front. Nobody is well-served.

4. AIDS is not a sexually transmitted disease. That paradigm has set a scapegoating and antigay agenda in place that the public thinks is solidly based on science. It is only based on homophobic and racist nosology, epidemiology and virology. The scientists behind the paradigm are charlatans and crooks.

5. The Centers for Disease Control in Atlanta and the Pasteur Institute in Paris have a great deal in common with the institutions of Nazi medicine. For Blacks, everything these institutions have done in the name of AIDS really constitutes a second Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment.

Elements of a Scientific Ponzi Scheme like the Montagnier-Agut HIV Fraud Ponzi Scheme and HHV-6 Cover-up

A scientific Ponzi scheme begins with a central seminal or foundational scientific fraud and is  sometimes built on an infrastructure of smaller scientific frauds. Like the fake dividends issued in a strictly financial Ponzi scheme, a scientific Ponzi scheme issues fake dividends in the form of ongoing fraud-based research often framed as "breakthroughs" and bogus extrapolations which make it look like everything is above board and that what, in reality, is scientific fraud, appears to the rest of the scientific community and the public as good faith progress.

A classic scientific Ponzi scheme like the Montgnier-Agut HIV Fraud Ponzi Scheme and HHV-6 Cover-up include elements like these:

1. Nosological fraud.

2. Epidemiological fraud.

3. Virological fraud.

4. Treatment fraud.

5. Public health policy fraud.

6. Concealment of negative scientific data and paradigm-challenging anomalies.

7.  Use of an elite network of "old boys" and pseudo-activist provocateurs to censor critics and whistleblowers.

8. Chronic obscurantism.

9. If necessary, vigilantism and witch-hunts against any intellectuals, scientists, or citizens who constitute any form of resistance to the Ponzi scheme.

10. A subservient scientific press that is used as a conveyor belt for the Ponzi scheme's propaganda.

Everything always looks like it is working perfectly in a Ponzi scheme, until the moment comes when someone look at the books and blows the whistle.  Hopefully, that game-changing moment for the Montagnier-Agut HIV Fraud Ponzi Scheme and HHV-6 Cover-up is coming soon.