If one assumeS Rebecca Culshaw's Substack is correct, what were 20 moments in the last 40 ears when scientist should have recognized something was wrong in the HIV/AIDS paradigm?
From Perplexity A.I. Assuming Rebecca Culshaw's Substack and books are correct, here are 20 moments in the last 40 years when scientists should have recognized fundamental problems in the HIV/AIDS paradigm, based on major controversies, failed predictions, and repeatedly anomalous findings highlighted by critics like Culshaw and others: Key Moments Highlighting Paradigm Failures 1984: Early claims of HIV as the sole cause of AIDS were made before conclusive evidence, leading to widespread adoption of a viral paradigm without rigorous challenge or alternate hypothesis consideration. Mid-1980s: Discovery disputes between Luc Montagnier (France) and Robert Gallo (US) over the "AIDS virus" involved accusations of sample misappropriation and scientific misconduct, but were glossed over for the sake of an international consensus. 1987: Peter Duesberg publicly challenged the HIV-AIDS causation model, noting unanswered questions around risk group disease patterns and viral ...
