The gay community needs to protest the retraction of Patricia Goodson's article on AIDS.




AUTHOR’S NOTE OF DISAGREEMENT WITH RETRACTION

“Questioning the HIV-AIDS Hypothesis: 30 Years of Dissent” synthesizes the arguments and evidence previously published in the professional/scientific literature, authored by several reputable scholars questioning the premise that HIV causes AIDS. The central thesis in this review asserts: “far from being condemned to extinction, competing explanations for, and thorough questioning of the mainstream premise persist” 30 years after the original HIV-causes-AIDS hypothesis was proposed. After conducting a thorough investigation upon the article’s publication in 2014, reviewers and editors alike admitted to the review’s “utility … as a historical summary of dissenting theories of AIDS” (Frontiers Retraction Statement). Despite this assessment and the concomitant re-classifying of the article as an “Opinion”, editors now have concluded their efforts were both “misguided and ineffectual” (Frontiers Retraction Statement) and are retracting the article. Although the Official Statement from the editors accurately reflects the issues, I respectfully disagree with the decision to retract the article for the following reasons: (a) The article is a historic review of arguments and data previously published in both scientific journals and widely circulated books. In itself, the article lacks the power to constitute a “potential public health risk” (Frontiers Retraction Statement), given it is merely presenting already-available information. (b) Attempts to regulate access to information appear contrary to the spirit driving Open Access publishing. (c) Debates, grounded in evidence published in the professional/scientific literature, constitute the very essence of science and knowledge development. Retraction of information that elicits or contributes to such debates represents the antithesis of the scientific method. 


Read the article that is being retracted for political reasons:

https://oaktrust.library.tamu.edu/bitstream/handle/1969.1/154821/Goodson%20Manuscript%20Reformatted%20%20-%2010.29.2019.pdf?sequence=7&isAllowed=y

The Retraction:

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2019.00334/full

Popular Posts in the Last 7 Days

The Harvard Declaration of the HHV-6 Rights of Man

A Perplexity conversation about self-deceit, conspiracy, Arendt and AIDS

Perplexity on K.S. and AIDS and inflammation

Forgotten Plague co-director and cinematographer Nicole Castillo wins Emmy nomination the 4-part investigative series "SIDA, Sin VIH" which means "AIDS Without HIV"

Perplexity on the AIDS paradigm

The day Randy Shilts almost recognized HIV as a massive fraud.

From Perplexity: Here are 20 ways the pharmaceutical industry should reorient their AIDS efforts based on Rebecca Culshaw’s Substack critique of the HIV paradigm:

The interview about the transmission of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome from 20 years ago that should have changed everything.

Groq on Hannah Arendt and science

Popular Post in the Last 30 Days

From Perplexity A.I.: A major nosological mistake in AIDS—meaning a fundamental error in how the disease is defined, classified, or diagnosed—could be the most consequential nosological error in history because of several deeply impactful social, scientific, and ethical consequences.

A Perplexity conversation about self-deceit, conspiracy, Arendt and AIDS

Perplexity on Rebecca Culshaw Smith, and PrEP as Genocide

Imagine a rewrite of this cockamamie Chronic Fatigue Syndrome abstract:

The African Swine Fever Virus Rights of Man

Groq on Hannah Arendt and science

Why in the world aren't pigs being used as animal models for HHV-6?

Perplexity names the AIDS Paradigm 20

Popular Posts from the Last Year

Perplexity on Rebecca Culshaw Smith, and PrEP as Genocide

Why Brigitte Huber may be the most important AIDS and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome researcher

From Perplexity A.I.: A major nosological mistake in AIDS—meaning a fundamental error in how the disease is defined, classified, or diagnosed—could be the most consequential nosological error in history because of several deeply impactful social, scientific, and ethical consequences.

Perplexity on K.S. and AIDS and inflammation

Perplexity on the issue of endogenous versus exogenous retroviruses. Is this a key to the HIV mistake?

Oral Kaposi's Sarcoma looks like the Crimson Crescents in Chronic Fatigue Syndrome patients.

HHV-6 and Male infertility (from Perplexity)

All Time Most Popular Posts

Dr. Bhupesh Prusty and Professor Thomas Rudel discuss their HHV-6 research

Anthony Fauci was part of the gang that silenced and destroyed Judy Mikovits.

Was Judy Mikovits destroyed because her XMRV work would have ultimately shown HIV is a total fraud?

Is Chronic Fatigue Syndrome the other AIDS epidemic in the gay community?