Concern Trolling Explodes as New Patricia Goodson Piece Questions Government's HIV Theory of AIDS

 By Patricia Goodson:
Since 1984, when the hypothesis that HIV-causes-AIDS was announced, many scholars have questioned the premise and offered alternative explanations. Thirty years later, competing propositions as well as questioning of the mainstream hypothesis persist, often supported by prominent scientists. This article synthesizes the most salient questions raised, alongside theories proposing non-viral causes for AIDS. The synthesis is organized according to four categories of data believed to support the HIV-AIDS hypothesis: retroviral molecular markers; transmission electron microscopy (EM) images of retroviral particles; efficacy of anti-retroviral drugs; and epidemiological data. Despite three decades of concerted investments in the mainstream hypothesis, the lingering questions and challenges synthesized herein offer public health professionals an opportunity to reflect on their assumptions and practices regarding HIV/AIDS.

“The HIV/AIDS hypothesis is one hell of a mistake”, wrote Kary Mullis in 1996 [(1), p. 14]. Mullis – Nobel Laureate in Chemistry, 1993 – and other distinguished scientists have claimed the HIV-causes-AIDS hypothesis is false, unproductive, and unethical. They have done so since 1984, when the hypothesis was proposed. Thirty years after countless studies, resources, and attempts to cure have been poured into the HIV-AIDS hypothesis, it may be fruitful to ask: What happened to those views and voices that once disagreed? Have the past three decades, with their scientific, technological, and public health developments, been sufficient to convince critics of the hypothesis’ value? Have these advances been able to silence the questioning?

http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpubh.2014.00154/full


THE CASE AGAINST HIV

http://thecaseagainsthiv.net/
That HIV causes AIDS has been the officially sanctioned view for about 3 decades, believed almost universally but questioned openly by thousands of people, some of whom are expert in relevant sciences 1,2,3. These dissidents point out that a comprehensive reading of the mainstream literature together with analysis of mainstream data demonstrates conclusively that HIV is neither a necessary nor a sufficient cause of AIDS.

Popular Posts in the Last 7 Days

A Perplexity conversation about self-deceit, conspiracy, Arendt and AIDS

Today Only!

Is Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Associated Kaposi's Sarcoma (CFSKS) a diagnosis all doctors should become aware of?

Perplexity on Rebecca Culshaw Smith, and PrEP as Genocide

The Miami journalist who tried to blow the whistle

A moment of truth every intellectual and scientist in France, Europe and Russia should be aware of!

Popular Post in the Last 30 Days

A Perplexity conversation about self-deceit, conspiracy, Arendt and AIDS

Today Only!

Memo to CFS patients and CFS quacks: Let's get something straight.

Is Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Associated Kaposi's Sarcoma (CFSKS) a diagnosis all doctors should become aware of?

Perplexity on Rebecca Culshaw Smith, and PrEP as Genocide

From Perplexity A.I.: List 20 questions that would make the HIV establishment (which has demonized critics of the HIV theory) uncomfortable.

When will the media ask Fauci about the Kaposi's Sarcoma epidemic in Chronic Fatigue Syndrome patients?

Popular Posts from the Last Year

Perplexity on Rebecca Culshaw Smith, and PrEP as Genocide

Why Brigitte Huber may be the most important AIDS and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome researcher

From Perplexity A.I.: A major nosological mistake in AIDS—meaning a fundamental error in how the disease is defined, classified, or diagnosed—could be the most consequential nosological error in history because of several deeply impactful social, scientific, and ethical consequences.

Oral Kaposi's Sarcoma looks like the Crimson Crescents in Chronic Fatigue Syndrome patients.

How Kaposi's Sarcoma almost undermined the HIV theory of AIDS

A Perplexity conversation about self-deceit, conspiracy, Arendt and AIDS

If the establishment decides that the nosology of AIDS is wrong and HIV is not the cause of AIDS could that be considered a Black Swan event?

Perplexity on the issue of endogenous versus exogenous retroviruses. Is this a key to the HIV mistake?

All Time Most Popular Posts

Dr. Bhupesh Prusty and Professor Thomas Rudel discuss their HHV-6 research

Anthony Fauci was part of the gang that silenced and destroyed Judy Mikovits.

Was Judy Mikovits destroyed because her XMRV work would have ultimately shown HIV is a total fraud?

Is Chronic Fatigue Syndrome the other AIDS epidemic in the gay community?