Concern Trolling Explodes as New Patricia Goodson Piece Questions Government's HIV Theory of AIDS
By Patricia Goodson:
http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpubh.2014.00154/full
THE CASE AGAINST HIV
http://thecaseagainsthiv.net/
That HIV causes AIDS has been the officially sanctioned view for about 3 decades, believed almost universally but questioned openly by thousands of people, some of whom are expert in relevant sciences 1,2,3. These dissidents point out that a comprehensive reading of the mainstream literature together with analysis of mainstream data demonstrates conclusively that HIV is neither a necessary nor a sufficient cause of AIDS.
Since 1984, when the
hypothesis that HIV-causes-AIDS was announced, many scholars have
questioned the premise and offered alternative explanations. Thirty
years later, competing propositions as well as questioning of the
mainstream hypothesis persist, often supported by prominent scientists.
This article synthesizes the most salient questions raised, alongside
theories proposing non-viral causes for AIDS. The synthesis is organized
according to four categories of data believed to support the HIV-AIDS
hypothesis: retroviral molecular markers; transmission electron
microscopy (EM) images of retroviral particles; efficacy of
anti-retroviral drugs; and epidemiological data. Despite three decades
of concerted investments in the mainstream hypothesis, the lingering
questions and challenges synthesized herein offer public health
professionals an opportunity to reflect on their assumptions and
practices regarding HIV/AIDS.
“The HIV/AIDS hypothesis is one hell of a mistake”, wrote Kary Mullis in 1996 [(1),
p. 14]. Mullis – Nobel Laureate in Chemistry, 1993 – and other
distinguished scientists have claimed the HIV-causes-AIDS hypothesis is
false, unproductive, and unethical. They have done so since 1984, when
the hypothesis was proposed. Thirty years after countless studies,
resources, and attempts to cure have been poured into the HIV-AIDS
hypothesis, it may be fruitful to ask: What happened to those views and
voices that once disagreed? Have the past three decades, with their
scientific, technological, and public health developments, been
sufficient to convince critics of the hypothesis’ value? Have these
advances been able to silence the questioning?
http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpubh.2014.00154/full
THE CASE AGAINST HIV
http://thecaseagainsthiv.net/
That HIV causes AIDS has been the officially sanctioned view for about 3 decades, believed almost universally but questioned openly by thousands of people, some of whom are expert in relevant sciences 1,2,3. These dissidents point out that a comprehensive reading of the mainstream literature together with analysis of mainstream data demonstrates conclusively that HIV is neither a necessary nor a sufficient cause of AIDS.
