A conversation with Perplexity about Camus and Rebecca Culshaw Smith
In what book or essay did Camus talk about priests in earlier centuries walk prisoners to their executions holding masks up in front of them?
The passage Camus wrote about priests holding masks in front of prisoners as they walked to executions appears in "Reflections on the Guillotine." He describes how, in earlier centuries, a priest would accompany the condemned to the scaffold and hold a mask before their face, shielding them from the view of the crowd and the horror ahead. This ritual, as recounted, underscores the psychological torment and isolation of those awaiting execution. The text reflects deeply on the cruelty and performative aspects of capital punishment, as well as the facade of mercy shown by religious and state officials.
While the exact passage about the priest holding a mask is referenced in summary form across essay guides and discussions, the available excerpts from "Reflections on the Guillotine" in public sources describe the psychological agony and rituals associated with execution, including the actions of priests and officials. For the precise wording, the passage occurs in the section where Camus discusses the rituals of execution, but full-text translations may need to be consulted for verbatim details
Rebecca Culshaw's Substack critiques the concept of "retained in care" in the AIDS medical paradigm, arguing that it acts like a mask, much as Camus described priests holding masks before condemned prisoners to obscure reality and present a façade of mercy. Culshaw describes the phenomenon wherein patients are considered success stories simply for being “retained in care” even while suffering severe side effects, organ damage, or disability as a result of lifelong medication, all the while being reassured that being “undetectable” is a good outcome.
This framing closely parallels Camus’s mask metaphor: just as the mask shielded prisoners from the horror of their fate while maintaining the ritual of piety, "retained in care" serves to cover the harsh realities of chronic patient suffering and the questionable ethics of such medical practices. The population is presented not with the unvarnished reality—patients’ suffering and ongoing debility—but with reassuring metrics and slogans that maintain the legitimacy of current practice, obscuring individual pain behind the comforting language of adherence and retention.
Camus’s critique exposes how institutions employ rituals and symbols to obscure the suffering their actions inflict; similarly, Culshaw’s analysis exposes the mask-like role of “retained in care” in the AIDS medical model, hiding physical decline and loss behind the statistical success of long-term medical retention.