Posts

Showing posts with the label Duesberg

One of the most important books ever written about AIDS is not available.

Science Sold Out: Does HIV Really Cause AIDS? (Terra Nova)  Paperback – January 2, 2007 There are many well-established scientific reasons that the HIV/AIDS hypothesis is highly doubtful. In  Science Sold Out , Rebecca Culshaw describes her slow uncovering of these reasons over her years researching HIV for her work constructing mathematical models of its interaction with the immune system. It is rare that a researcher who has received funding to study HIV ever expresses any doubt in the paradigm, and an even rarer event still when she abandons the field altogether. This book focuses on the changing definition of AIDS and the flaws in all HIV testing. In a much broader sense, it explains how the current, government-based structure of scientific research has corrupted science as the search for truth. It offers not only scientific reasons for HIV/AIDS being untenable, but also sociological explanations as to how the theory was accepted by the media and the world so quickly. In p...

The battle between Peter Duesberg and Anthony Fauci

 

Popular Post in the Last 30 Days

A Perplexity conversation about self-deceit, conspiracy, Arendt and AIDS

Perplexity on Rebecca Culshaw Smith, and PrEP as Genocide

Memo to CFS patients and CFS quacks: Let's get something straight.

Today Only!

From Perplexity A.I.: A major nosological mistake in AIDS—meaning a fundamental error in how the disease is defined, classified, or diagnosed—could be the most consequential nosological error in history because of several deeply impactful social, scientific, and ethical consequences.

Is Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Associated Kaposi's Sarcoma (CFSKS) a diagnosis all doctors should become aware of?

Popular Posts from the Last Year

Perplexity on Rebecca Culshaw Smith, and PrEP as Genocide

Why Brigitte Huber may be the most important AIDS and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome researcher

From Perplexity A.I.: A major nosological mistake in AIDS—meaning a fundamental error in how the disease is defined, classified, or diagnosed—could be the most consequential nosological error in history because of several deeply impactful social, scientific, and ethical consequences.

Oral Kaposi's Sarcoma looks like the Crimson Crescents in Chronic Fatigue Syndrome patients.

How Kaposi's Sarcoma almost undermined the HIV theory of AIDS

If the establishment decides that the nosology of AIDS is wrong and HIV is not the cause of AIDS could that be considered a Black Swan event?

A Perplexity conversation about self-deceit, conspiracy, Arendt and AIDS

Perplexity on the issue of endogenous versus exogenous retroviruses. Is this a key to the HIV mistake?

All Time Most Popular Posts

Dr. Bhupesh Prusty and Professor Thomas Rudel discuss their HHV-6 research

Anthony Fauci was part of the gang that silenced and destroyed Judy Mikovits.

Was Judy Mikovits destroyed because her XMRV work would have ultimately shown HIV is a total fraud?

Is Chronic Fatigue Syndrome the other AIDS epidemic in the gay community?