Etienne de Harven, the Alan Turing of CFS and AIDS (without realizing it)




Etienne de Harven, MD is a Belgian-born pathologist and electron microscopist. Born in Brussels, he did most of his work in New York City, Paris and Toronto.[2] He did pioneering research on viruses, mostly related to murine leukemia.[3] He is former President of the Electron Microscopy Society of America (now Microscopy Society of America).[4][5]

More from AIDS Myth:
Etienne de Harven M.D. is Emeritus Professor of Pathology, University of Toronto. He worked in electron microscopy primarily on the ultrastructure of retroviruses throughout his professional career of 25 years at the Sloan Kettering Institute in New York, and 13 years at the University of Toronto.
Response to a letter concerning HERVs
Etienne de Harven

January, 2010

There are exogenous viruses and others which are endogenous!

For instance, in the case of a flu contagion, the virus that attacks you comes from another sick person! In this case, we may talk of an exogenous virus, which means this virus is coming from outside, by contagion.

If you expose yourself to too much ultraviolet radiation, on very sunny skiing slopes, and get a cold sore on your lip, this unpleasant pimple will apparently be due to the herpes virus that was hiding somewhere  inside of you, and was activated by the UV radiation! In this case, we’re talking about an endogenous virus, which means we’re carrying it inside ourselves.

There very probably must be something similar concerning retroviruses!

These famous mouse leukemia retroviruses I have talked about so much (maybe too much!) have always been INTERPRETED as being exogenous, although their contagiousness has never been proved.

And when the most illustrious Montagnier claimed he had discovered the AIDS virus, HIV was also considered an exogenous virus, which could therefore explain this disease’s contagiousness.

However, we know today that AIDS is not contagious.

Moreover, we have been aware, for 10 or 15 years, of the existence of endogenous retroviruses inside the human body!

They are called "Human endogenous retroviruses,"  HERVs! (Have a look at Human Endogenous Retroviruses on Google!)

ALL human beings are carrying them! You, me, and ALL others!

It is as if these HERVs had been engraved into our chromosomes and they apparently do us  no harm, although many laboratories are trying to demonstrate their possible pathogenic action.

Yet more amazing, when the human genome was eventually deciphered (and widely publicized!), it was reveled that approximately 8% of our genome is identical — or nearly identical — to retroviral genomes!

Our HERVs are somehow asleep in our chromosomes, and rarely manifest themselves as formed viral particles that can be observed with the electron microscope. Except in the human embryonic tissues, such as for instance, the placenta! In this tissue, it is different: in the human placental cells, it is easy to detect typical retrovirus particles, clearly visible with the electron microscope! Now, we’re getting there: these bloody viruses have distorted both the interpretation of and research concerning the so-called AIDS virus!

That’s what I tried — with an almost complete failure — to explain to them, to those “Rethinkers” who had come to listen to me in Oackland,  and who themselves ignore both the nature and the existence of HERVs.

In 1983, at the Institut Pasteur, Montagnier did mix his cell cultures with T-cells coming from umbilical cord blood, therefore PLACENTAL cells, most probably full of HERVs. That easily explains why they actually saw a lot of real retroviruses in their samples, but those viruses — the one they could readily examine — had strictly nothing to do with the AIDS patient they were examining using those very cell cultures. (Additionally, Montagnier reports, in another paper, that their experiments wouldn’t have worked if the T-cells they were mixing with their culture were not of placental origin.)

Another point: the AIDS patients’ so-called viral load:

Firstly,  no one could ever see a single retrovirus in AIDS patients’ blood, even in those patients who were said to have a “high viral load”! Very strange, isn’t it?

But we all have DNA in our circulating blood. And, as I pointed out above, 8% of our DNA is identical to the retroviruses’ genome! Bingo! This is what they’re detecting with this intelligent PCR method which was invented by Nobel Prize laureate Kary Mullis! This is what they wrongly interpret as retroviral “molecular markers,” which are totally invisible, as already stated above.

In short, all so-called HIV research has been heavily distorted by the stubborn ignorance of the HIV/AIDS orthodoxy’s researchers, who still refuse to admit that HERVs have pathetically distorted the interpretation of their results.

This is essentially what was in my presentation in Oakland (RA 2009).

Etienne

Ten Lies About Aids Paperback – September 30, 2008

by Etienne De Harven (Author), Jean-Claude Roussez (Contributor)

http://www.amazon.com/Lies-About-Aids-Etienne-Harven/dp/1425154263

Popular Posts in the Last 7 Days

A Perplexity conversation about self-deceit, conspiracy, Arendt and AIDS

Is Kaposi's Sarcoma in Uganda connected to the African Swine Fever epidemic in pigs?

Eight patients who took the popular HIV/AIDS drug Truvada and similar tenofovir-based drugs have sued Gilead Sciences, Inc., claiming the giant pharmaceutical company deliberately withheld a much safer version of these drugs from the market for more than a decade in a patent-timing scheme to maximize profits. As a result, "hundreds of thousands of HIV-infected patients experienced serious, permanent and sometimes fatal complications that may have been avoided had the company been honest about the safer alternative it had in the wings.

Perplexity on Rebecca Culshaw Smith, and PrEP as Genocide

From Perplexity A.I.: A major nosological mistake in AIDS—meaning a fundamental error in how the disease is defined, classified, or diagnosed—could be the most consequential nosological error in history because of several deeply impactful social, scientific, and ethical consequences.

Perplexity on Mishmash Multifactorial Theories of CFS/AIDS

Perplexity on AIDS and CFS

Popular Post in the Last 30 Days

From Perplexity A.I.: A major nosological mistake in AIDS—meaning a fundamental error in how the disease is defined, classified, or diagnosed—could be the most consequential nosological error in history because of several deeply impactful social, scientific, and ethical consequences.

Perplexity on Rebecca Culshaw Smith, and PrEP as Genocide

A Perplexity conversation about self-deceit, conspiracy, Arendt and AIDS

The African Swine Fever Virus Rights of Man

Why in the world aren't pigs being used as animal models for HHV-6?

Imagine a rewrite of this cockamamie Chronic Fatigue Syndrome abstract:

And updated version of the Harvard Declaration of the HHV-6 Rights of Man

Popular Posts from the Last Year

Perplexity on Rebecca Culshaw Smith, and PrEP as Genocide

Why Brigitte Huber may be the most important AIDS and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome researcher

From Perplexity A.I.: A major nosological mistake in AIDS—meaning a fundamental error in how the disease is defined, classified, or diagnosed—could be the most consequential nosological error in history because of several deeply impactful social, scientific, and ethical consequences.

Oral Kaposi's Sarcoma looks like the Crimson Crescents in Chronic Fatigue Syndrome patients.

Perplexity on the issue of endogenous versus exogenous retroviruses. Is this a key to the HIV mistake?

Perplexity on K.S. and AIDS and inflammation

HHV-6 and Male infertility (from Perplexity)

All Time Most Popular Posts

Dr. Bhupesh Prusty and Professor Thomas Rudel discuss their HHV-6 research

Anthony Fauci was part of the gang that silenced and destroyed Judy Mikovits.

Was Judy Mikovits destroyed because her XMRV work would have ultimately shown HIV is a total fraud?

Is Chronic Fatigue Syndrome the other AIDS epidemic in the gay community?