Author's disagreement with the political retraction of her paper on the history of AIDS dissent




AUTHOR’S NOTE OF DISAGREEMENT WITH RETRACTION

“Questioning the HIV-AIDS Hypothesis: 30 Years of Dissent” synthesizes the arguments and evidence previously published in the professional/scientific literature, authored by several reputable scholars questioning the premise that HIV causes AIDS. The central thesis in this review asserts: “far from being condemned to extinction, competing explanations for, and thorough questioning of the mainstream premise persist” 30 years after the original HIV-causes-AIDS hypothesis was proposed. After conducting a thorough investigation upon the article’s publication in 2014, reviewers and editors alike admitted to the review’s “utility … as a historical summary of dissenting theories of AIDS” (Frontiers Retraction Statement). Despite this assessment and the concomitant re-classifying of the article as an “Opinion”, editors now have concluded their efforts were both “misguided and ineffectual” (Frontiers Retraction Statement) and are retracting the article. Although the Official Statement from the editors accurately reflects the issues, I respectfully disagree with the decision to retract the article for the following reasons: (a) The article is a historic review of arguments and data previously published in both scientific journals and widely circulated books. In itself, the article lacks the power to constitute a “potential public health risk” (Frontiers Retraction Statement), given it is merely presenting already-available information. (b) Attempts to regulate access to information appear contrary to the spirit driving Open Access publishing. (c) Debates, grounded in evidence published in the professional/scientific literature, constitute the very essence of science and knowledge development. Retraction of information that elicits or contributes to such debates represents the antithesis of the scientific method. 


Read the article that is being retracted for political reasons:

https://oaktrust.library.tamu.edu/bitstream/handle/1969.1/154821/Goodson%20Manuscript%20Reformatted%20%20-%2010.29.2019.pdf?sequence=7&isAllowed=y

Popular Posts in the Last 7 Days

Has Maureen Hanson found another opportunistic infection that links Chronic Fatigue Syndrome and AIDS?

Outbreak of COVID-19-related syndrome in children raises questions about the causation of COVID-19

Nicholas Regush on Konnie Knox

And what will this pill do to HHV-6-infected women?

Suppose the real cause of AIDS is X and X is also found in Chronic Fatigue Syndrome. What are the possibilities of what X is?

The Harvard Declaration of the HHV-6 Rights of Man

Perplexity on Montagnier

Perplexity on Dr. Rebecca Culshaw Smiths Critique of AIDS and the Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment

Popular Post in the Last 30 Days

Why Brigitte Huber may be the most important AIDS and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome researcher

How Kaposi's Sarcoma almost undermined the HIV theory of AIDS

Has Maureen Hanson found another opportunistic infection that links Chronic Fatigue Syndrome and AIDS?

Rebecca Culshaw Smith on a shocking new AIDS tragedy

HHV-6 is both "ubiquitous" and "remarkable."

Perplexity writes a fantasy Joe Rogan interview with Rebecca Culshaw

Twenty Potential Mistakes Leading to the Misidentification of HIV as the Cause of AIDS

Popular Posts from the Last Year

Oral Kaposi's Sarcoma looks like the Crimson Crescents in Chronic Fatigue Syndrome patients.

Ablashi discusses HHV-6, AIDS, Alzheimer's, and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome

Why HIV should be referred to as "a red herring."

Anthony Fauci was part of the gang that silenced and destroyed Judy Mikovits.

Dr. Rebecca Culshaw Smith's book is discussed on Twitter

All Time Most Popular Posts

Dr. Bhupesh Prusty and Professor Thomas Rudel discuss their HHV-6 research

Anthony Fauci was part of the gang that silenced and destroyed Judy Mikovits.

Was Judy Mikovits destroyed because her XMRV work would have ultimately shown HIV is a total fraud?

Is Chronic Fatigue Syndrome the other AIDS epidemic in the gay community?