Author's disagreement with the political retraction of her paper on the history of AIDS dissent




AUTHOR’S NOTE OF DISAGREEMENT WITH RETRACTION

“Questioning the HIV-AIDS Hypothesis: 30 Years of Dissent” synthesizes the arguments and evidence previously published in the professional/scientific literature, authored by several reputable scholars questioning the premise that HIV causes AIDS. The central thesis in this review asserts: “far from being condemned to extinction, competing explanations for, and thorough questioning of the mainstream premise persist” 30 years after the original HIV-causes-AIDS hypothesis was proposed. After conducting a thorough investigation upon the article’s publication in 2014, reviewers and editors alike admitted to the review’s “utility … as a historical summary of dissenting theories of AIDS” (Frontiers Retraction Statement). Despite this assessment and the concomitant re-classifying of the article as an “Opinion”, editors now have concluded their efforts were both “misguided and ineffectual” (Frontiers Retraction Statement) and are retracting the article. Although the Official Statement from the editors accurately reflects the issues, I respectfully disagree with the decision to retract the article for the following reasons: (a) The article is a historic review of arguments and data previously published in both scientific journals and widely circulated books. In itself, the article lacks the power to constitute a “potential public health risk” (Frontiers Retraction Statement), given it is merely presenting already-available information. (b) Attempts to regulate access to information appear contrary to the spirit driving Open Access publishing. (c) Debates, grounded in evidence published in the professional/scientific literature, constitute the very essence of science and knowledge development. Retraction of information that elicits or contributes to such debates represents the antithesis of the scientific method. 


Read the article that is being retracted for political reasons:

https://oaktrust.library.tamu.edu/bitstream/handle/1969.1/154821/Goodson%20Manuscript%20Reformatted%20%20-%2010.29.2019.pdf?sequence=7&isAllowed=y

Popular Posts in the Last 7 Days

From Perplexity A.I.: List 20 questions that would make the HIV establishment (which has demonized critics of the HIV theory) uncomfortable.

All these mistakes have been made in AIDS and they have led to the Chronic Fatigue Syndrome epidemic

Why Brigitte Huber may be the most important AIDS and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome researcher

Memo to CFS patients and CFS quacks: Let's get something straight.

A Perplexity conversation about self-deceit, conspiracy, Arendt and AIDS

Have Dharam Ablashi and Robert Gallo been covering up the presence of African Swine Fever in America by calling it HHV-6?

Popular Post in the Last 30 Days

Memo to CFS patients and CFS quacks: Let's get something straight.

From Perplexity A.I.: List 20 questions that would make the HIV establishment (which has demonized critics of the HIV theory) uncomfortable.

How Kaposi's Sarcoma almost undermined the HIV theory of AIDS

From Perplexity: Here are 20 ways the pharmaceutical industry should reorient their AIDS efforts based on Rebecca Culshaw’s Substack critique of the HIV paradigm:

Important and provocative books about HHV-6 and the epidemics it may be causing available from Amazon in print editions or on Kindle:

Popular Posts from the Last Year

Perplexity on Rebecca Culshaw Smith, and PrEP as Genocide

Why Brigitte Huber may be the most important AIDS and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome researcher

From Perplexity A.I.: A major nosological mistake in AIDS—meaning a fundamental error in how the disease is defined, classified, or diagnosed—could be the most consequential nosological error in history because of several deeply impactful social, scientific, and ethical consequences.

Oral Kaposi's Sarcoma looks like the Crimson Crescents in Chronic Fatigue Syndrome patients.

How Kaposi's Sarcoma almost undermined the HIV theory of AIDS

If the establishment decides that the nosology of AIDS is wrong and HIV is not the cause of AIDS could that be considered a Black Swan event?

Kevin McKiernan and Brett Weinstein on Fauci and AIDS

All Time Most Popular Posts

Dr. Bhupesh Prusty and Professor Thomas Rudel discuss their HHV-6 research

Anthony Fauci was part of the gang that silenced and destroyed Judy Mikovits.

Was Judy Mikovits destroyed because her XMRV work would have ultimately shown HIV is a total fraud?

Is Chronic Fatigue Syndrome the other AIDS epidemic in the gay community?