Author's disagreement with the political retraction of her paper on the history of AIDS dissent




AUTHOR’S NOTE OF DISAGREEMENT WITH RETRACTION

“Questioning the HIV-AIDS Hypothesis: 30 Years of Dissent” synthesizes the arguments and evidence previously published in the professional/scientific literature, authored by several reputable scholars questioning the premise that HIV causes AIDS. The central thesis in this review asserts: “far from being condemned to extinction, competing explanations for, and thorough questioning of the mainstream premise persist” 30 years after the original HIV-causes-AIDS hypothesis was proposed. After conducting a thorough investigation upon the article’s publication in 2014, reviewers and editors alike admitted to the review’s “utility … as a historical summary of dissenting theories of AIDS” (Frontiers Retraction Statement). Despite this assessment and the concomitant re-classifying of the article as an “Opinion”, editors now have concluded their efforts were both “misguided and ineffectual” (Frontiers Retraction Statement) and are retracting the article. Although the Official Statement from the editors accurately reflects the issues, I respectfully disagree with the decision to retract the article for the following reasons: (a) The article is a historic review of arguments and data previously published in both scientific journals and widely circulated books. In itself, the article lacks the power to constitute a “potential public health risk” (Frontiers Retraction Statement), given it is merely presenting already-available information. (b) Attempts to regulate access to information appear contrary to the spirit driving Open Access publishing. (c) Debates, grounded in evidence published in the professional/scientific literature, constitute the very essence of science and knowledge development. Retraction of information that elicits or contributes to such debates represents the antithesis of the scientific method. 


Read the article that is being retracted for political reasons:

https://oaktrust.library.tamu.edu/bitstream/handle/1969.1/154821/Goodson%20Manuscript%20Reformatted%20%20-%2010.29.2019.pdf?sequence=7&isAllowed=y

Popular Posts in the Last 7 Days

Perplexity on the Circular Reasoning in AIDS

Perplexity on Rebecca Culshaw Smith, and PrEP as Genocide

Perplexity on the new CFS research and its connection to Dr. Rebecca Culshaw's Smith's new AIDS paradigm

Perplexity on the K.S. paradigm of AIDS

Could Jordan Peterson and his daughter become Chronic Fatigue Syndrome and HHV-6 activists?

At the NIH Conference Bhupesh Prusty may have established himself as the Luc Montagnier of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome

Popular Post in the Last 30 Days

Perplexity on Rebecca Culshaw Smith, and PrEP as Genocide

Perplexity on the Circular Reasoning in AIDS

Perplexity A.I. on Dr. Rebecca Culshaw Smith and Informed Consent for AIDS Patients.

What if HHV-8 is a real biomarker for the intertwined Chronic Fatigue Syndrome and AIDS epidemics?

Popular Posts from the Last Year

Ablashi discusses HHV-6, AIDS, Alzheimer's, and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome

Oral Kaposi's Sarcoma looks like the Crimson Crescents in Chronic Fatigue Syndrome patients.

Dr. Bhupesh Prusty and Professor Thomas Rudel discuss their HHV-6 research

Why HIV should be referred to as "a red herring."

Anthony Fauci was part of the gang that silenced and destroyed Judy Mikovits.

Dr. Rebecca Culshaw Smith's book is discussed on Twitter

All Time Most Popular Posts

Dr. Bhupesh Prusty and Professor Thomas Rudel discuss their HHV-6 research

Anthony Fauci was part of the gang that silenced and destroyed Judy Mikovits.

Was Judy Mikovits destroyed because her XMRV work would have ultimately shown HIV is a total fraud?

Is Chronic Fatigue Syndrome the other AIDS epidemic in the gay community?